A national surveillance program was undertaken in Canada to establish the prevalence and distribution of Salmonella and thermophilic Campylobacter biotypes in slaughter animals and poultry. During the years 1983 to 1986, samples were collected from federally inspected abbatoirs across Canada and tested at regional laboratories. The laboratory isolation procedure for thermophilic Campylobacter included selective enrichment and isolates were characterized according to Lior's biotyping scheme. Salmonella were isolated from 17.5% pork, 2.6% beef and 4.1% veal carcasses. Thermophilic Campylobacter were isolated from 16.9% pork, 22.6% beef and 43.1% veal carcasses. Salmonella were isolated from 69.1 % turkey and 60.9% chicken carcasses, and thermophilic Campylobacter were isolated from 73.7% and 38.2% turkey and chicken carcasses, respectively. Salmonella typhimurium was the most frequently isolated serotype, and predominant in broiler chickens from 1983 to 1985. Salmonella brandenburg was predominant in pork, and Salmonella schwarzengrund was the primary serotype from turkey carcasses. Campylobacter jejuni biotypes I and II were the most frequently isolated biotypes from beef, veal and poultry. Although Campylobacter coli biotype I was the predominant thermophilic Campylobacter in pork, 41.1% of the biotyped isolates from pork were C. jejuni biotypes I and II.

No abstract

The performances of five automated microbial identification systems, relative to that of a reference identification system, for their ability to accurately and repeatedly identify six common food-borne pathogens were assessed. The systems assessed were the MicroLog system (Biolog Inc., Hayward, Calif.), the Microbial Identification System (MIS; MIDI Inc., Newark, Del.), the VITEK system (bioMérieux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo.), the MicroScan WalkAway 40 system (Dade-MicroScan International, West Sacramento, Calif.), and the Replianalyzer system (Oxoid Inc., Nepean, Ontario, Canada). The sensitivities and specificities of these systems for the identification of food-borne isolates of Bacillus cereus,Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes,Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp., and verotoxigenic Escherichia coli were determined with 40 reference positive isolates and 40 reference negative isolates for each pathogen. The sensitivities of these systems for the identification of these pathogens ranged from 42.5 to 100%, and the specificities of these systems for the identification of these pathogens ranged from 32.5 to 100%. Some of the systems had difficulty correctly identifying the reference isolates when the results were compared to those from the reference identification tests. The sensitivity of MIS for the identification of S. aureus, B. cereus,E. coli, and C. jejuni, for example, ranged from 47.5 to 72.5%. The sensitivity of the Microlog system for the identification of E. coli was 72.5%, and the sensitivity of the VITEK system for the identification of B. cereus was 42.5%. The specificities of four of the five systems for the identification of all of the species tested with the available databases were greater than or equal to 97.5%; the exception was MIS for the identification of C. jejuni, which displayed a specificity of 32.5% when it was tested with reference negative isolates including Campylobacter coli and otherCampylobacter species. All systems had >80% sensitivities for the identification of Salmonella species andListeria species at the genus level. The repeatability of these systems for the identification of test isolates ranged from 30 to 100%. Not all systems included all six pathogens in their databases; thus, some species could not be tested with all systems. The choice of automated microbial identification system for the identification of a food-borne pathogen would depend on the availability of identification libraries within the systems and the performance of the systems for the identification of the pathogen.

No abstract

Salmonella contamination is a major problem in the poultry industry, but no data are available on the prevalence in geese. From two slaughter facilities in Manitoba, 130 carcass rinsings and 315 cloacal swabs from a total of 17 flocks of domestic geese were examined for salmonellae. Sixty percent of the carcass rinsings and 18.4% of the cloacal swabs were positive. Most of the isolates were serotyped, and some analysis of the results is presented. Three culture media were compared, and a modified dulcitol brilliant-green novobiocin medium was found to be more selective than brilliant-green and brilliant-green sulfa agars.