1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01139-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a bulk-milk ELISA test for the classification of herd-level bovine leukemia virus status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these ELISA have only been evaluated by comparisons with the AGID test, which is significantly less sensitive than the RIP assay. [3][4][5][6][7] The performance of ELISA for detecting BLV antibodies in samples of pooled milk has been evaluated in herds whose cattle had been characterized by the poorly sensitive AGID 10,[15][16][17] or in pooled samples made by artificially mixing samples from each cow. 8 Unlike other ELISA, the blocking ELISA 108 described here has been critically compared with the RIP assay in a relatively large number of serum samples from cattle of various ages, breeds, and geographic locations as well as from cattle belonging to herds with various rates of BLV infection and cattle in early stages of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of these ELISA have only been evaluated by comparisons with the AGID test, which is significantly less sensitive than the RIP assay. [3][4][5][6][7] The performance of ELISA for detecting BLV antibodies in samples of pooled milk has been evaluated in herds whose cattle had been characterized by the poorly sensitive AGID 10,[15][16][17] or in pooled samples made by artificially mixing samples from each cow. 8 Unlike other ELISA, the blocking ELISA 108 described here has been critically compared with the RIP assay in a relatively large number of serum samples from cattle of various ages, breeds, and geographic locations as well as from cattle belonging to herds with various rates of BLV infection and cattle in early stages of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several ELISA have been used for the detection of BLV antibodies in bulk-tank milk samples. 8,10,[15][16][17] In the study reported here, we described a new blocking ELISA for the detection of BLV antibodies in serum and milk samples of cattle. Sensitivity of this ELISA was critically evaluated in a large number of serum samples from characterized cattle of various origins whose BLV status had been defined by use of the RIP assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tests adapted for use with bulk milk samples is of interest because of the potential cost savings and the possibility for the automation of testing. Tests adapted for use with bulk milk have been developed for several bovine diseases, such as those caused by Brucella abortus (22), bovine leukemia virus (19), bovine viral diarrhea virus (15), Leptospira hardjo (1), bovine herpesvirus type 1 (24), Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (14), bovine corona virus (23), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (2), Coxiella burnetii (16), Ostertagia spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk tank milk ELISA is useful for identification of herds which are negative for BLV infection. Since the specificity of the ELISA test for milk was moderately low, herds identified as positive by the ELISA would require further testing at the individual or herd level to definitively establish their BLV status (24). The sensitivity and specificity of the milk ELISA is estimated to be adequate until the prevalence of BLVinfected individuals in the country is less than 1% (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%