Health care teams continue to be a constructive way to approach, assess, coordinate, plan, and facilitate the care of clients and populations. Independent of practice setting, some type of team is in place, engaging different professionals and specialists. There has been considerable evolution of these teams over the years, with a heritage of terms to frame each one, including “multidisciplinary,” “interdisciplinary,” and “transdisciplinary.” However, these long-standing framings have been replaced by a timelier model that shifts both focus and aim of the team effort. Interprofessional team-based care (IPTBC) sets the tone for how students entering the industry are educated and empowers the workforce to a more intentional means to the care end. This is the first in a 2-part series focusing on the evolution and implementation of IPTBC across the industry. Part 1 focuses on the history and fundamental concepts of interprofessional models. Evidence and outcomes to promote the value proposition for IPTBC implementation are also provided. Purpose/Objectives: This article: Reviews the evolution of health care teams;Defines IPTBC;Discusses the challenges to implementation of IPTBC; andIdentifies the implications for professional case management. Primary Practice Setting(s): Applicable to all health and behavioral health settings where case management is practiced. Findings/Conclusions: Interprofessional team-based care models demonstrate a successful means to achieve client-driven, quality, and cost-effective care across disease states and practice settings. Implications for Case Management Practice: With case management so closely linked to the fiscal imperatives of organizations, engagement in IPTBC is a necessity for every practice setting. Poor team collaboration contributes to unsuccessful outcomes for clients, increased costs, and concerning quality and risk management issues for the organization. The latest generation of value-based care initiatives and complex population health needs (e.g., social determinants of health, co-occurring physical and behavioral health) translates to greater pressures on case managers to maximize financial risk and attain their share of financial incentives (e.g., bonuses, shared savings) by avoiding readmissions, preventable complications, and duplicate services.
Professionals strive to effectively intervene with patients and their support systems facing end-of-life care decisions. It is essential case managers actively consider the intricacies of ethical practice and current contexts including death with dignity legislation, shared decision making, and shifts in regulations and reimbursement for end-of-life care.Case management's ethical envelope will continue to be pushed. To that end amid shifting societal constructs, professionals must have mastery of applicable codes, standards, principles, and rules essential for adherence to ethical practice.
The increasing incidence and impact of bullying across all sectors have made it a major workforce performance management challenge. Health care settings are especially tense environments, often making it difficult for individuals to distinguish between bullying behavior and high expectations for staff. Bullying impacts both direct targets and bystanders who witness the assaultive behaviors, with ethical implications as well.Case management is poised to promote a safe health care workplace for patients and practitioners alike amid these intricate circumstances. Understanding types of bullying bosses and leadership styles is integral to a case manager's success in the workplace.
Professionals who hesitate to confront and address incidents of disruptive and oppressive behavior in the health care workplace potentially practice unethically. Bullying has fostered a dangerous culture of silence in the industry, one that impacts patient safety, quality care delivery plus has longer term behavioral health implications for the professionals striving to render care. Add the escalating numbers specific to workplace violence and the trends speak to an atmosphere of safety and quality in the health care workplace, which puts patients and professionals at risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.