Discretion is described as a hallmark of professional work. Professional discretion rests on trust in the ability of certain occupational groups to make sound decisions 'on behalf' of societal authorities. It has been suggested that in Europe, managerialist-influenced policies with increased focus on control and accountability have placed pressure on professional discretion. Although earlier studies have demonstrated tensions between external and internal accountability, they have not highlighted how legal forms of authority are key aspects in the regulation of education, or how professionals handle legal standards in their practices. The purpose of this study is to understand the interplay between legal standards and professional discretion. An organisationalroutines perspective is used to examine this interplay. Empirically, the students' legal rights to a good psychosocial environment are used as a case. Based on interviews with principals, deputies and teachers in Norwegian schools, the paper examines how legal norms are translated into social practices, and how practitioners construct and legitimise their work. The study shows how preventive and remedial measures are prevalent in Norwegian schools. When laws and regulations require specific procedures, they are transformed into routines based on the schools' iterative practices. The study adds an empirical analysis to current understandings of juridification in education.
This article analyzes student teachers' interactions in different practices over a period of one semester. We use Cultural-Historical Activity theory as a theoretical framework to address how interactions at the boundaries in teacher education are constructed and made relevant to the participants when they are working on object constructions. In the analysis, we show how an object, conceptualization of goals in education, emerges and develop in interactions, and how the object's trajectory differs as the students move between practices. In the analysis we call these practices learning spheres. Our findings indicate that the participants' positions are of importance. In teacher-led situations, such as supervision and mentoring, the teachers influenced the construction of the object, whereas in group work, the student teachers pursued and explored a variety of object constructions. Meaning emerges in the dialectical relationship between activity and action, and is regulated by the enactment of rules and norms, and the division of labor. An important finding is that the student teachers' learning trajectories vary across the different parts of the teacher education program.
There are so many people to thank as my PhD work nears its end. This work process and its final product are the results of inspiring and enriching interactions with diverse individuals and communities. My thanks go to all who have been a part of the process in various waysto you who have encouraged me and sustained my energy and capacity! I want, nevertheless, to pinpoint some of the interactions that I believe have had particular significance for my work and for my becoming a researcher by expressing my heartfelt thanks to: My main supervisor, Eli Ottesen, and my co-supervisor, Rune Krumsvik, for your unyielding moral support and brave efforts to keep me on track. Eli, you have been a constant inspiration and an always-guiding force in my work. Thank you for your dedicated readings of numerous drafts, your insightful and critical comments on my work, and your interesting discussions and collaborative writings. Having you as my main supervisor and mentor has been an honour! Rune, I am grateful for our Skype meetings, your readings and comments on the manuscripts, and the constructive ways in which you have supported me, challenged me, and helped me to move forward in my work. The Research Group for Studies on Workplace Learning in the Knowledge Society (FALK), for approving my application and funding my PhD work. My thanks go to all the participants in the group for their inspiring seminars and workshops. In particular, I want to thank Monica Nerland and Hege Hermansen. Monica, thank you for leading the group in such a professional way and for commenting on the articles. You have helped me significantly in refining my writings. Hege, thank you for our fruitful discussions and our joint endeavor in writing our extended abstract. The participants in the two projects being studied, who kindly allowed me to observe their activities. You made this PhD project possible.
Denne artikkelen analyserer to sentrale sider ved Kunnskapsløftet - grunnleggende ferdigheter og kvalitetsvurdering – sett fra skolenivå. Hvordan tolkes disse sentrale sidene ved reformen av aktører på skolenivå? Empirien er hentet fra seks grunnskoler og fire videregående skoler, valgt ut etter prinsippet om maksimal variasjon. På bakgrunn av intervjuer med rektorer og lærere får vi et bilde av hvordan arbeidet med grunnleggende ferdigheter og vurdering foregår på disse ti skolene. Hvordan skoleledere og lærere arbeider med disse sentrale sidene ved Kunnskapsløftet, kan i neste omgang si noe om deres profesjonsforståelse. Samlet sett tyder vårt materiale på at reformen ikke har medført store endringer i skolenes profesjonsforståelse, slik det er eksemplifisert gjennom beretninger om kvalitetsarbeidet og de grunnleggende ferdighetene. Hvis hensikten med reformen har vært å myndiggjøre lærerprofesjonen, ser det ikke ut til at lærerne har fått tilstrekkelig informasjon til å oppfatte hvor dypt læreplanmålet om grunnleggende ferdigheter griper inn i de enkelte fagene, eller hvordan det nasjonale systemet for kvalitetsutvikling kan bidra til å styrke lærerarbeidet. Den politiske styringen ser også ut til å ha vært for svak; rektorene og lærerne i vårt materiale opplever ikke at disse forventningene er blitt kommunisert til dem. Analyserer vi empirien i lys av mekanismer for styring, ser vi at det er en spenning mellom profesjon og politikk og mellom sentralisering og desentralisering. Hvis hensikten har vært å legge til rette for profesjonelt selvstyre, ser ikke profesjonen ut til å ha tatt det rommet som blir tilbudt. Dermed strammes det politiske grepet i form av nasjonale veiledende retningslinjer og rapporteringskrav. En slik analyse innebærer imidlertid et syn på styring som forutsetter et tydelig skille mellom styring og forvaltning, mens grensene i praksis er uklare. Studier fra andre land viser at gode forbindelseslinjer mellom styrings- og forvaltningsnivåene kan være avgjørende for vellykket implementering av utdanningsreformer. Når det i vår studie ser ut til at slike dialoger er dårlig utviklet, kan det ligge et uutnyttet potensial for utviklingsorienterte prosesser nettopp i relasjonene mellom styringsnivåene og den lokale skole.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.