This analysis examined mortality among late-life Soviet Jewish immigrants in Israel, and the contribution of post-migration work status to their survival. The study linked 1997 survey data to mortality records, seven years hence. The results revealed that mortality was associated with older age, male gender, morbidity, and having less resourceful social networks. More importantly, after controlling for these background variables work status remained a significant correlate. Late-life immigrants who had never worked in the host country had a significantly greater risk of death than their immigrant counterparts who had ever worked (or were still working).
Intimate partner homicide is a major public health concern around the world and the most lethal outcome of domestic violence. Its impact on the surviving bereaved offspring is immense, yet there is a significant gap in the literature regarding the long-term effects of this type of loss. The current qualitative study is aimed at filling this gap. The study used the constructivist paradigm of bereavement as a theoretical background to reveal the meanings constructed by bereaved Israeli daughters whose biological mothers were killed in acts of intimate partner homicide by their biological fathers. Three main themes of meaning emerged from 12 in-depth semi-structured interviews: “destruction of one’s home”; “blast injury”; and “in doubt”. An examination of the three themes in the current study reveals a deep shatter in participants’ world of meaning to its very basic foundations. In light of intense psychological and social forces, the participants constructed and reconstructed such narratives of meaning in a continuous process of meaning making throughout their lives, years, and decades post loss. Derived from the findings are implications for practice. Mental healthcare professionals must attend to this basic shatter with an extreme level of caution, as they help homicide survivors reconstruct a world of meaning shattered by loss. Moreover, the long-lasting effects emphasize an appropriate legal and political involvement; specifically, policy regulations and rights should provide psychosocial care programs that are suited to the needs of offspring co-victims of intimate partner homicide in particular. In light of the strong social influence on participants’ loss experience, further efforts are required to raise social awareness about this burning social concern and to fight the stigmatization of co-victims of homicide in general and co-victims of intimate partner homicide in particular.
Objectives
To identify mental health prospective trajectories before and after
a second lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associations
with somatic symptoms.
Design
Prospective Study.
Setting
Population-based study drawn from a probability-based internet panel
of over 100 000 Israelis.
Participants
Adults aged 18 years or more, representative of the adult Israeli
population. The participants were measured at two time points (time 1
(T1) pre-second lockdown N=1029; response rate=76.17%; time 2 (T2)
post-second lockdown N=764; response rate=74.24%).
Main outcome measures
Trajectories of anxiety and adjustment disorder based on clinical
cut-off score for probable diagnoses across T1-T2, somatic symptoms at
T2. The four trajectories: stable-low, (no probable diagnosis),
stable-high (stable probable diagnosis), exacerbation (no probable
diagnosis at T1, probable diagnosis at T2), recovery (probable diagnosis
at T1, no probable diagnosis at T2).
Results
Three anxiety trajectories predicted probable somatic symptoms
(stable-high OR=6.451; exacerbation OR=5.379; recovery OR=2.025)
compared with the stable-low trajectory. The three adjustment disorder
trajectories also predicted somatic symptoms (stable-high OR=4.726;
exacerbation OR=6.419; recovery OR=4.666) compared with the stable-low
trajectory.
Conclusions
Our data show elevated somatic symptoms among those whose mental
health trajectories were poor, exacerbated and those who recovered
following the second lockdown. The presentation of somatic symptoms may
mask psychological vulnerabilities, even among those who appear to have
recovered from the stressor. This indicates that lockdown may be a
double-edged sword and should be carefully administered given these
populations vulnerabilities.
ObjectiveSubjective well-being was evaluated three weeks after Super Typhoon Haiyan struck the Philippines. Based on the Conservation of Resources theory, which focuses on the role of resources in understanding adjustment following trauma, data was collected on lost resources. In line with the Conservation of Resources theory, four categories of resources were defined: objects—residential property; condition—gender health state and witness to injury; personal—coping strategies; energy–relationships.Design and settingsEight hundred thirty-four people from the Philippines filled out self-report measures using an online interview system regarding: socio demographics data, subjective well-being, using the Delighted Terrible Faces Scale (DTS), disaster related experiences, coping strategies, personal relationships, obtained through support sources (close family, relatives and friends, community) and assessing problems with those relationships after Haiyan.ResultsSubjective well-being was predicted by the following classes of resources: objects (home damage) condition (self-rated health and witness to injury), personal (positive reframing and self-blame coping strategies) and energy resources (relations and problems in relations).ConclusionsThe results imply the important role individual’s resources (i.e. objects, personal characteristics, conditions, and energies) might play in promoting subjective well-being, following natural disaster.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.