2021
DOI: 10.1177/08862605211021981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shattered Voices: Daughters’ Meaning Reconstruction in Loss of a Mother to Intimate Partner Homicide

Abstract: Intimate partner homicide is a major public health concern around the world and the most lethal outcome of domestic violence. Its impact on the surviving bereaved offspring is immense, yet there is a significant gap in the literature regarding the long-term effects of this type of loss. The current qualitative study is aimed at filling this gap. The study used the constructivist paradigm of bereavement as a theoretical background to reveal the meanings constructed by bereaved Israeli daughters whose biological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is evident in the findings and as suggested by previous studies of homicide losses and IPF trauma (Alisic, Groot, Snetselaar, Stroeken, Hehenkamp, & van de Putte, 2017;Armour, 2005;Pitcho-Prelorentzos et al, 2021;Steeves & Parker, 2007), participants' loss experience (i.e., their autobiographical memory) played a pivotal role in their attempts to articulate a narrative of who they are (McAdams & McLean, 2013). As the bereaved in our study are survivors of homicide, and the biological daughters of both perpetrator and victim of the same crime, they are related to the event as its direct "co-victims," as well as the direct (genetic and structural) extensions of both murder victim and perpetrator.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As is evident in the findings and as suggested by previous studies of homicide losses and IPF trauma (Alisic, Groot, Snetselaar, Stroeken, Hehenkamp, & van de Putte, 2017;Armour, 2005;Pitcho-Prelorentzos et al, 2021;Steeves & Parker, 2007), participants' loss experience (i.e., their autobiographical memory) played a pivotal role in their attempts to articulate a narrative of who they are (McAdams & McLean, 2013). As the bereaved in our study are survivors of homicide, and the biological daughters of both perpetrator and victim of the same crime, they are related to the event as its direct "co-victims," as well as the direct (genetic and structural) extensions of both murder victim and perpetrator.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The media, legal system, and social services tend to perceive the deceased mothers as the “direct” victims and IPF offspring are usually referred to as “secondary victims” or co-victims of homicide, typically defined as “individuals who have familial connections with the victim and thus are indirectly victimised” (Connolly & Gordon, 2015, p. 1). The findings of the current study and previous findings (Pitcho-Prelorentzos et al, 2021) contribute to the understanding of the experience of offspring survivorship following IPF as they portray a direct, full, and independent form of victimhood, which stands apart from the mothers’ victimhood. Thus, defining and referring to this traumatically bereaved population as co victims disregards their unique survivorship experience and symbolically couples their victimhood with the mothers in a way that endorses “pathological identification” with the mothers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participants in this study struggled to find meaning in the loss and described a prolonged struggle for psychological survival, as they felt alone and unsafe in the world and anxious about future unexpected tragedies. These accounts were accompanied by a dissociative tendency to protect themselves from the overwhelmingly traumatic and disenfranchised experience (Pitcho-Prelorentzos et al, 2022). Another study emphasized the complex process of identity formation in this population, due primarily to the disidentifications with each of their parents stemming, in turn, from their biological relationship with both the victim and the perpetrator of the socially taboo crime of domestic homicide (Pitcho-Prelorentzos et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%