BACKGROUND Although spontaneous miscarriage is the most common complication of human pregnancy, potential contributing factors are not fully understood. Advanced maternal age has long been recognised as a major risk factor for miscarriage, being strongly related with fetal chromosomal abnormalities. The relation between paternal age and the risk of miscarriage is less evident, yet it is biologically plausible that an increasing number of genetic and epigenetic sperm abnormalities in older males may contribute to miscarriage. Previous meta-analyses showed associations between advanced paternal age and a broad spectrum of perinatal and paediatric outcomes. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on paternal age and spontaneous miscarriage. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of paternal age on the risk of spontaneous miscarriage. SEARCH METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies up to August 2019. The following free text and MeSH terms were used: paternal age, father’s age, male age, husband’s age, spontaneous abortion, spontaneous miscarriage, abortion, miscarriage, pregnancy loss, fetal loss and fetal death. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analysis were followed. Original research articles in English language addressing the relation between paternal age and spontaneous miscarriage were included. Exclusion criteria were studies that solely focused on pregnancy outcomes following artificial reproductive technology (ART) and studies that did not adjust their effect estimates for at least maternal age. Risk of bias was qualitatively described for three domains: bias due to confounding, information bias and selection bias. OUTCOMES The search resulted in 975 original articles. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Nine of these studies were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). Advanced paternal age was found to be associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. Pooled risk estimates for miscarriage for age categories 30–34, 35–39, 40–44 and ≥45 years of age were 1.04 (95% CI 0.90, 1.21), 1.15 (0.92, 1.43), 1.23 (1.06, 1.43) and 1.43 (1.13, 1.81) respectively (reference category 25–29 years). A second meta-analysis was performed for the subgroup of studies investigating first trimester miscarriage. This showed similar pooled risk estimates for the first three age categories and a slightly higher pooled risk estimate for age category ≥45 years (1.74; 95% CI 1.26, 2.41). WIDER IMPLICATIONS Over the last decades, childbearing at later ages has become more common. It is known that frequencies of adverse reproductive outcomes, including spontaneous miscarriage, are higher in women with advanced age. We show that advanced paternal age is also associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage. Although the paternal age effect is less pronounced than that observed with advanced maternal age and residual confounding by maternal age cannot be excluded, it may have implications for preconception counselling of couples comprising an older aged male.

No abstract

is a 23-year-old medical student, who is combining research with his medical internship. His intention is to become a dedicated gynaecologist. He has already carried out several studies on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and will be investigating RPL as a future PhD student.

No consistent conclusions can be drawn from the meta-analysis. Discrepancies in the meta-analysis are the result of different screening techniques, varying time points of screening, and use of incorrect control groups. Furthermore, more detailed analyses of the characteristics and specificity of the antibodies involved are essential.

Immunohistopathology of irradiated uninvolved skin of photosensitive LE patients did not reveal the same pathologic trafficking of LCs and neutrophils as described for PLE patients. We conclude that different mechanisms are operative in the pathogenesis of PLE and photosensitive LE.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: To identify, besides maternal age and the number of previous pregnancy losses, additional characteristics of couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) that improve the prediction of an ongoing pregnancy. Design: Hospital-based cohort study in couples who visited specialized RPL units of two academic centers between 2012 and 2020. Setting: Two academic centers in the Netherlands. Patients: Clinical data from 526 couples with unexplained RPL were used in this study. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measures: The final model to estimate the chance of a subsequent ongoing pregnancy was determined using a backward selection process and internally validated using bootstrapping. Model performance was assessed in terms of calibration and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). Results: Subsequent ongoing pregnancy was achieved in 345 of 526 couples (66%). The number of previous pregnancy losses, maternal age, paternal age, maternal body mass index, paternal body mass index, maternal smoking status, and previous in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment were predictive of the outcome. The optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.63 compared with 0.57 when using only the number of previous pregnancy losses and maternal age. Conclusions: The identification of additional predictors of a subsequent ongoing pregnancy after RPL, including male characteristics, is significant for both clinicians and couples with RPL. At the same time, we showed that the predictive ability of the current model is still limited and more research is warranted to develop a model that can be used in clinical practice.