Exercise training improves arterial baroreflex control in heart failure (HF) rabbits. However, the mechanisms involved in the amelioration of baroreflex control are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that exercise training would increase the afferent aortic depressor nerve activity (AODN) sensitivity in ischemic-induced HF rats. Twenty ischemic-induced HF rats were divided into trained (n = 11) and untrained (n = 9) groups. Nine normal control rats were also studied. Power spectral analysis of pulse interval, systolic blood pressure, renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), and AODN were analyzed by means of autoregressive parametric spectral and cross-spectral algorithms. Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity of heart rate (HR) and RSNA were analyzed during spontaneous variation of systolic blood pressure. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was higher in HF rats compared with that in the normal control group (P = 0.0001). Trained HF rats had a peak oxygen uptake higher than untrained rats and similar to normal controls (P = 0.01). Trained HF rats had lower low-frequency [1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 14.6 +/- 3 normalized units (nu), P = 0.0003] and higher high-frequency (97.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 85.0 +/- 3 nu, P = 0.0005) components of pulse interval than untrained rats. Trained HF rats had higher spontaneous baroreceptor sensitivity of HR (1.19 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.1 ms/mmHg, P = 0.003) and RSNA [2.69 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.29 +/- 0.3 arbitrary units (au)/mmHg, P = 0.04] than untrained rats. In HF rats, exercise training increased spontaneous AODN sensitivity toward normal levels (trained HF rats, 1,791 +/- 215; untrained HF rats, 1,150 +/- 158; and normal control rats, 2,064 +/- 327 au/mmHg, P = 0.05). In conclusion, exercise training improves AODN sensitivity in HF rats.

The influence of exercise training on left ventricular function at rest (R), at anaerobic threshold (AT), and during peak exercise (PE) was evaluated in 12 healthy untrained and 13 trained (T) subjects who underwent Doppler echocardiography at R and radionuclide ventriculography at R and during exercise. The end-diastolic volume and stroke volume were significantly higher in the T group than in the untrained group at R. The ejection fraction rose significantly from R to AT and from AT to PE (80.0 +/- 0.84 vs. 83.6 +/- 0.91%), but no significant difference was observed between groups. The peak diastolic filling rate rose significantly during exercise, with a further significant increase observed in the T group (AT, 6.38 +/- 0.40 vs. 5.01 +/- 0.16 end-diastolic counts/s; PE, 8.24 +/- 0.42 vs. 7.15 +/- 0.35 end-diastolic counts/s). The percent variation of minimal systolic counts fell significantly at AT and PE in relation to R. Our data demonstrate that exercise training produces a significant increase in peak diastolic filling rate but no change in systolic function during exercise and that metabolic acidosis caused by exercise does not limit systolic function.

No abstract

IntroductionExaggerated blood pressure response to exercise (EEBP = SBP ≥ 190 mmHg for women and ≥210 mmHg for men) during cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a predictor of cardiovascular risk. Sympathetic hyperactivation and decreased baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) seem to be involved in the progression of metabolic syndrome (MetS) to cardiovascular disease.ObjectiveTo test the hypotheses: (1) MetS patients within normal clinical blood pressure (BP) may present EEBP response to maximal exercise and (2) increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and reduced BRS are associated with this impairment.MethodsWe selected MetS (ATP III) patients with normal BP (MetS_NT, n = 27, 59.3% males, 46.1 ± 7.2 years) and a control group without MetS (C, n = 19, 48.4 ± 7.4 years). We evaluated BRS for increases (BRS+) and decreases (BRS−) in spontaneous BP and HR fluctuations, MSNA (microneurography), BP from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and auscultatory BP during CPET.ResultsNormotensive MetS (MetS_NT) had higher body mass index and impairment in all MetS risk factors when compared to the C group. MetS_NT had higher peak systolic BP (SBP) (195 ± 17 vs. 177 ± 24 mmHg, P = 0.007) and diastolic BP (91 ± 11 vs. 79 ± 10 mmHg, P = 0.001) during CPET than C. Additionally, we found that MetS patients with normal BP had lower spontaneous BRS− (9.6 ± 3.3 vs. 12.2 ± 4.9 ms/mmHg, P = 0.044) and higher levels of MSNA (29 ± 6 vs. 18 ± 4 bursts/min, P < 0.001) compared to C. Interestingly, 10 out of 27 MetS_NT (37%) showed EEBP (MetS_NT+), whereas 2 out of 19 C (10.5%) presented (P = 0.044). The subgroup of MetS_NT with EEBP (MetS_NT+, n = 10) had similar MSNA (P = 0.437), but lower BRS+ (P = 0.039) and BRS− (P = 0.039) compared with the subgroup without EEBP (MetS_NT−, n = 17). Either office BP or BP from ABPM was similar between subgroups MetS_NT+ and MetS_NT−, regardless of EEBP response. In the MetS_NT+ subgroup, there was an association of peak SBP with BRS− (R = −0.70; P = 0.02), triglycerides with peak SBP during CPET (R = 0.66; P = 0.039), and of triglycerides with BRS− (R = 0.71; P = 0.022).ConclusionNormotensive MetS patients already presented higher peak systolic and diastolic BP during maximal exercise, in addition to sympathetic hyperactivation and decreased baroreflex sensitivity. The EEBP in MetS_NT with apparent well-controlled BP may indicate a potential depressed neural baroreflex function, predisposing these patients to increased cardiovascular risk.