BackgroundObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is tightly linked to some components of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). However, most of the evidence evaluated individual components of the MetS or patients with a diagnosis of OSA that were referred for sleep studies due to sleep complaints. Therefore, it is not clear whether OSA exacerbates the metabolic abnormalities in a representative sample of patients with MetS.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe studied 152 consecutive patients (age 48±9 years, body mass index 32.3±3.4 Kg/m2) newly diagnosed with MetS (Adult Treatment Panel III). All participants underwent standard polysomnography irrespective of sleep complaints, and laboratory measurements (glucose, lipid profile, uric acid and C-reactive protein). The prevalence of OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15 events per hour of sleep) was 60.5%. Patients with OSA exhibited significantly higher levels of blood pressure, glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, LDL, cholesterol/HDL ratio, triglycerides/HDL ratio, uric acid and C-reactive protein than patients without OSA. OSA was independently associated with 2 MetS criteria: triglycerides: OR: 3.26 (1.47–7.21) and glucose: OR: 2.31 (1.12–4.80). OSA was also independently associated with increased cholesterol/HDL ratio: OR: 2.38 (1.08–5.24), uric acid: OR: 4.19 (1.70–10.35) and C-reactive protein: OR: 6.10 (2.64–14.11). Indices of sleep apnea severity, apnea-hypopnea index and minimum oxygen saturation, were independently associated with increased levels of triglycerides, glucose as well as cholesterol/HDL ratio, uric acid and C-reactive protein. Excessive daytime sleepiness had no effect on the metabolic and inflammatory parameters.Conclusions/SignificanceUnrecognized OSA is common in consecutive patients with MetS. OSA may contribute to metabolic dysregulation and systemic inflammation in patients with MetS, regardless of symptoms of daytime sleepiness.
The short-term reduction in blood pressure after exercise in elderly hypertensive patients is associated with a decrease in stroke volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume. The 22-h postexercise reduction in blood pressure demonstrates the clinical relevance of low-intensity exercise in elderly hypertensive patients.
CE. Molecular basis for the improvement in muscle metaboreflex and mechanoreflex control in exercise-trained humans with chronic heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 307: H1655-H1666, 2014. First published October 10, 2014 doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00136.2014.-Previous studies have demonstrated that muscle mechanoreflex and metaboreflex controls are altered in heart failure (HF), which seems to be due to changes in cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway and changes in receptors on afferent neurons, including transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1 (TRPV1) and cannabinoid receptor type-1 (CB1). The purpose of the present study was to test the hypotheses: 1) exercise training (ET) alters the muscle metaboreflex and mechanoreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in HF patients.2) The alteration in metaboreflex control is accompanied by increased expression of TRPV1 and CB1 receptors in skeletal muscle.3) The alteration in mechanoreflex control is accompanied by COX-2 pathway in skeletal muscle. Thirty-four consecutive HF patients with ejection fractions Ͻ40% were randomized to untrained (n ϭ 17; 54 Ϯ 2 yr) or exercise-trained (n ϭ 17; 56 Ϯ 2 yr) groups. MSNA was recorded by microneurography. Mechanoreceptors were activated by passive exercise and metaboreceptors by postexercise circulatory arrest (PECA). COX-2 pathway, TRPV1, and CB1 receptors were measured in muscle biopsies. Following ET, resting MSNA was decreased compared with untrained group. During PECA (metaboreflex), MSNA responses were increased, which was accompanied by the expression of TRPV1 and CB1 receptors. During passive exercise (mechanoreflex), MSNA responses were decreased, which was accompanied by decreased expression of COX-2, prostaglandin-E2 receptor-4, and thromboxane-A2 receptor and by decreased in muscle inflammation, as indicated by increased miRNA-146 levels and the stable NF-B/ IB-␣ ratio. In conclusion, ET alters muscle metaboreflex and mechanoreflex control of MSNA in HF patients. This alteration with ET is accompanied by alteration in TRPV1 and CB1 expression and COX-2 pathway and inflammation in skeletal muscle. heart failure; muscle sympathetic nervous system; metaboreflex; mechanoreflex; exercise training
The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormalities of sympathetic neural and vascular control are present in mild and/or severe heart failure (HF) and to determine the underlying afferent mechanisms. Patients with severe HF, mild HF, and age-matched controls were studied. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and forearm vascular resistance (FVR) in the nonexercising arm were measured during mild and moderate static handgrip. MSNA during moderate handgrip was higher at baseline and throughout exercise in severe HF vs. mild HF (peak MSNA 67 +/- 3 vs. 54 +/- 3 bursts/min, P < 0.0001) and higher in mild HF vs. controls (33 +/- 3 bursts/min, P < 0.0001), but the change in MSNA was not different between the groups. The change in FVR was not significantly different between the three groups during static exercise. During isolation of muscle metaboreceptors, MSNA and blood pressure remained elevated in normal controls and mild HF but not in severe HF. During mild handgrip, the increase in MSNA was exaggerated in severe HF vs. controls and mild HF, in whom MSNA did not increase. In summary, the increase in MSNA during static exercise in severe HF appears to be attributable to exaggerated central command or muscle mechanoreceptor control, not muscle metaboreceptor control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.