In recent years, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Adult Cancer Pain have undergone substantial revisions focusing on the appropriate and safe prescription of opioid analgesics, optimization of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvant medications, and integration of nonpharmacologic methods of cancer pain management. This selection highlights some of these changes, covering topics on management of adult cancer pain including pharmacologic interventions, nonpharmacologic interventions, and treatment of specific cancer pain syndromes. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Adult Cancer Pain addresses additional aspects of this topic, including pathophysiologic classification of cancer pain syndromes, comprehensive pain assessment, management of pain crisis, ongoing care for cancer pain, pain in cancer survivors, and specialty consultations.

No abstract

In the original version, Reference 55 was published incorrectly. Reference 55, which previously read: 55. Khattab AM, El-Seify ZA, Shaaban A, Radojevic D, Jankovic I. Sevoflurane-emergence agitation: effect of supplementary lowdose oral ketamine premedication in preschool children undergoing dental surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(4):353-8. should read: 55. Khattab AM, El-Seify ZA. Sevoflurane-emergence agitation: effect of supplementary low-dose oral ketamine premedication in preschool children undergoing dental surgery.

Background-Improved cure rates for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia over the past 2 decades have allowed greater attention to patients' quality of life. Neuropathic pain is an unpleasant side effect of chemotherapeutic agents for leukemia, especially vincristine.

Background-The presence of a mediastinal mass in a child poses significant anesthesia-related risks including death. To optimize outcome clinicians must be able to predict which patients are at highest risk of anesthetic complications.

The FDA's 2012 risk evaluation and mitigation strategy is a major step toward systematically reducing the inherent risks of chronic opioid therapy for pain, but does not distinguish between risks related to sources of pain. This article discusses the effect of risk mitigation in the treatment of cancer pain, with a focus on pretreatment screening and ongoing monitoring in this patient population that often requires pain management at some time during cancer treatment. Experience with screening, risk stratification, and interventions at one cancer center is shared, along with some recommendations for practice. A new screening checklist is proposed that summarizes known risk factors. Patients with cancer are not protected from the problems of opioid abuse/misuse, and the multidisciplinary cancer treatment team should coordinate an evaluation of risk and the monitoring of aberrant behaviors as part of the comprehensive care plan.

Context Pediatric patients with solid tumors can have a significant symptom burden that impacts quality of life and end-of-life care needs. Objectives We evaluated outcomes and symptoms in children with solid tumors, and compared patterns of end-of-life care after implementation of a dedicated institutional pediatric palliative care service. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of children with solid tumors treated at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, before and after implementation of the institutional Quality of Life/Palliative Care (QoL/PC) Service in January 2007. Patients who died between July 2001- February 2005 (historical cohort; n=134) were compared to those who died between January 2007- January 2012 (QoL/PC cohort; n=57). Results Median time to first QoL/PC consultation was 17.2 months (range, 9–33 months). At consultation, 60% of children were not receiving or discontinued cancer-directed therapy. Within the QoL/PC cohort, 54 patients had documented symptoms; 94% required intervention for ≥ 3 symptoms; 76% received intervention for ≥ 5 symptoms. Eighty-three percent achieved their preferred place of death. Compared to the historical cohort, the QoL/PC cohort had more end-of-life discussions per patient (median, 12 vs. 3; P<0.001), earlier end-of-life discussions, with longer times before do-not-resuscitate orders (median, 195 vs. 2 days; P<0.001), and greater hospice enrollment (71% vs. 46%, P=0.002). Conclusion Although children with solid tumor malignancies may have significant symptom burden towards end of life, positive changes were documented in communication and in places of care and death following implementation of a pediatric palliative care service.

There were 146 patients with a median age of 4.6 years (range, 0.18-17.1 years), 46.6% were male, 80.8% were light skin colored, and 15.7% were younger than 2 years. The first-attempt success rates were 75% (95% CI, 63.8-84.2%) using AV300 and 73% (95% CI, 61.9-81.9%) using the standard method (P = 0.85). Patients with dark or medium skin color were 0.38 times less likely to have a successful first attempt than patients with light skin color. The difference between the two treatment groups in number of skin punctures and the time to insertion was not significant. Although the AV300 was easy to use and improved visualization of the veins, we found no evidence that it was superior to the standard method of intravenous cannulation in unselected pediatric patients under anesthesia.