Context Pediatric patients with solid tumors can have a significant symptom burden that impacts quality of life and end-of-life care needs. Objectives We evaluated outcomes and symptoms in children with solid tumors, and compared patterns of end-of-life care after implementation of a dedicated institutional pediatric palliative care service. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of children with solid tumors treated at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, before and after implementation of the institutional Quality of Life/Palliative Care (QoL/PC) Service in January 2007. Patients who died between July 2001- February 2005 (historical cohort; n=134) were compared to those who died between January 2007- January 2012 (QoL/PC cohort; n=57). Results Median time to first QoL/PC consultation was 17.2 months (range, 9–33 months). At consultation, 60% of children were not receiving or discontinued cancer-directed therapy. Within the QoL/PC cohort, 54 patients had documented symptoms; 94% required intervention for ≥ 3 symptoms; 76% received intervention for ≥ 5 symptoms. Eighty-three percent achieved their preferred place of death. Compared to the historical cohort, the QoL/PC cohort had more end-of-life discussions per patient (median, 12 vs. 3; P<0.001), earlier end-of-life discussions, with longer times before do-not-resuscitate orders (median, 195 vs. 2 days; P<0.001), and greater hospice enrollment (71% vs. 46%, P=0.002). Conclusion Although children with solid tumor malignancies may have significant symptom burden towards end of life, positive changes were documented in communication and in places of care and death following implementation of a pediatric palliative care service.

No abstract

No abstract

We investigate the variance in patterns of failure after Gamma Knife™ radiosurgery (GKRS) for patients with brain metastases based on the subtype of the primary breast cancer. Between 2000 and 2010, 154 breast cancer patients were treated with GKRS for brain metastases. Tumor subtypes were approximated based on hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status of the primary cancer: Luminal A/B (HR+/HER2(−)); HER2 (HER2+/ HR(−)); Luminal HER2 (HR+/HER2+), Basal (HR(−)/ HER2(−)), and then based on HER2 status alone. The median follow-up period was 54 months. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival times. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression models. Median number of lesions treated was two (range 1–15) with a median dose of 20 Gy (range 9–24 Gy). Median overall survival (OS) was 7, 9, 11 and 22 months for Basal, Luminal A/B, HER2, and Luminal HER2, respectively (p = 0.001), and was 17 and 8 months for HER2+ and HER(−) patients, respectively (p <0.001). Breast cancer subtype did not predict time to local failure (p = 0.554), but did predict distant brain failure rate (76, 47, 47, 36 % at 1 year for Basal, Luminal A/B, HER2, and Luminal HER2 respectively, p <0.001). An increased proportion of HER2+ patients experienced neurologic death (46 vs 31 %, p = 0.066). Multivariate analysis revealed that HER2+ patients (p = 0.007) independently predicted for improved survival. Women with basal subtype have high rates of distant brain failure and worsened survival. Our data suggest that differences in biologic behavior of brain metastasis occur across breast cancer subtypes.

EM, SJS, and TENS were rarely reported in patients undergoing radiotherapy alone. The majority of SJS and TENS occurred in irradiated patients with concomitant prescribed medications.