This research aims to describe the expectations of prospective teachers for students' mathematical thinking processes in solving problem-based on the Polya model. This model is perceived by the theory of mathematical thought processes proposed by Mason. A descriptive method with a qualitative approach was used in this research. The research subjects were 25 students from the
In math subjects, students must involve an analogy reasoning in solving geometry problems. Where students were required to use the ability of reasoning analogy which one of them in solving the building of curved side space (BRSL) with a previously studied concept was a flat building. The ability of reasoning analogy was thought to be influenced by the characteristics of students, that was cognitive style. The purpose of this study was to analyze the reasoning of analogies that reflective students had in solving geometry problems. The study was conducted on 27 students with varying cognitive styles. The research began with a Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) to classify reflective cognitive styles, followed by the Mathematical Ability Test (TKM). Then one reflective student was selected at high-skilled, one moderate-skilled student, and one low-skilled student. Furthermore, a BRSL analogy reasoning test (TPABRSL) was conducted and concluded with an interview. Research shows that High Reflective Students (SRT) can pass through all stages of analogy reasoning, namely encoding, inferring, mapping, and applying. Meanwhile, Moderate Reflective Students (SRS) and Low Reflective Students (SRR) were unable to pass all stages of analogy reasoning appropriately due to errors in the use of existing concepts and procedures.
Mathematical problem solving has become an important issue that was often discussed in school classes including in the covid-19 pandemic era. This research aimed to describe the level of reasoning ability of students in solving mathematical problems based on the cognitive style of field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles. The research approach used a was mixed-method of quantitative and qualitative. The subject of this study were students of Ibrahimy 1 Junior High School of Situbondo. The data collection techniques used were the form of tests and interviews. The data of the written test and interview results were tested for validity by triangulation. This research indicated that:(1) there were differences in student’s mathematical reasoning abilities between-FD and FI subjects; (2) the FI subject was able to re-examined, evaluated, and drew valid conclusions, but not for FD subject; (3) the FI subject has fulfilled all four mathematics reasoning indicators and classified as a very capable category; (4) the FD subject has fulfilled all three indicators and classified as capable enough category; and (5) generally, the level of mathematical reasoning ability of FI subjects group was very capable category as many as 21,43% and 14,29 % for FD subjects group.
<pre><strong>Abstract:</strong> The aim of the study was to describe the process of reasoning analogy of students impulsive in solving problems in constructing build arches. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive study using Sternberg's stage. The subjects in this study were three students of class X. The instruments used were MFFT, TKM, TPABRSL, and interview guidelines. The results of indicate that impulsive students are highly capable and are able to pass the encoding and inferring stages. However, students who are capable are not doing the mapping and applying stages correctly. Whereas low-ability impulsive students cannot pass all stages. </pre><strong>Abstrak:</strong><em> </em>Tujuan penelitian adalah menggambarkan proses penalaran analogi siswa impulsif dalam memecahkan masalah bangun ruang sisi lengkung. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan tahapan penalaran analogi menurut Sternberg. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah tiga siswa kelas X. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes MFFT, tes kemampuan matematika, tes penalaran analogi bangun ruang sisi lengkung (TPABRSL) dan pedoman wawancara. Hasil dari TPABRSL menunjukkan bahwa siswa impulsif berkemampuan tinggi dan sedang mampu melewati tahap <em>encoding dan inferring</em>. Akan tetapi, siswa berkemampuan sedang tidak melakukan tahap <em>mapping</em> dan tahap <em>applying </em>dengan benar, sedangkan siswa impulsif berkemampuan rendah tidak mampu melewati seluruh tahapan.
This research is a literature study with a descriptive qualitative approach to the type of literature that seeks to explain the important role of statistics in modern Islamic education and economics. In this literature study, researchers used various written sources such as books, articles, journals and other supporting documents relevant to the study. This study focuses on the discourse of statistical science and its role in the field of Islamic education and economics in the modern era. The results of the study show that statistics have been widely used by the public on various field such as politics, education, government, economics, and business. In education, statistics help students and learners or education practitioners in understanding data, measurement instruments, data analysis techniques, and drawing conclusions, both as evaluations and continuing education research. While in business, statistics can be applied to business calculations in the form of trend index numbers, dividend calculations, probability of profit in investments and stocks. Specifically, statistics have an important role in the banking sector, stock sector, capital market sector, insurance sector, multifinance and micro sector. Statistics present a lot of detailed and systematic information or data. Not only that, statistical science is highly recommended in Islamic economic and educational activities, and Allah likes people who carry out economic andeducational activities carried out with itqan, namely focused, clear, accurate, and compleKeywords: statistics, education, and modern islamic economy
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.