The Virtual Mock Loop, a versatile virtual mock circulation loop, was developed using a lumpedparameter model of the mechanically assisted human circulatory system. Inputs allow specification of a variety of continuous-flow pumps (left, right, or biventricular assist devices) and a total artificial heart that can selfregulate between left and right pump outputs. Hemodynamic inputs were simplified using a diseasebased input panel, allowing selection of a combination of cardiovascular disease states, including systolic and diastolic heart failure, stenosis, and/or regurgitation in each of the four valves, and high to low systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance values. The menu-driven output includes a summary of hemodynamic parameters and graphical output of selected flows, pressures, and volumes in the heart's four chambers as well as in the pulmonary artery and aorta.New tools to augment experimental research on implantable heart-assist devices and to increase our understanding of patient-specific pump interactions are in high demand. The purpose of this ongoing study is to demonstrate the use of a system analysis computer simulation to explore and better comprehend the interactions of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) pumps with a more extensive combination of patientspecific or simulation conditions than can be established by practical experimentation. Usability is an important factor in constructing computer models for research purposes, and among our primary objectives in creating this simulation model were to make it as portable and useful as possible outside the lab environment, by people not involved in the creation of its operational software.

Our new Virtual Mock Loop (VML) is a mathematical model designed to simulate the human cardiovascular system and gauge performance of mechanical circulatory support devices. We aimed to mimic the hemodynamic performance of Cleveland Clinic's self-regulating continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) via VML and evaluate VML's accuracy versus bench data from our standard mock circulatory loop. The VML reproduced 23 hemodynamic conditions. Systemic/pulmonary vascular resistances and pump rotational speed were set for VML from bench test data. We compared outputs (pump flow, left/right pump pressure rise, normalized pump performance, and atrial pressure difference) of the two methods. Data from pump flow and left pump pressure rise were similar, but right pump pressure rise slightly differed. Left pump normalized pump performance curves were similar. Right pump VML results were within the same performance range indicated by bench tests. The plots of atrial pressure differences of VML versus bench-test data were similar, but slightly differed in the midrange of systemic/pulmonary gradients. Virtual Mock Loop successfully reproduced results from our mock circulatory loop of CFTAH test conditions. The CFTAH's self-regulation feature of right pump performance was also calculated effectively. We foresee using versions of the VML for training, simulating physiologic cardiac conditions, and patient monitoring.

No abstract

The Virtual Mock Loop (VML) is a mathematical model designed to simulate mechanism of the human cardiovascular system interacting with mechanical circulatory support devices. Here, we aimed to mimic the hemodynamic performance of Cleveland Clinic’s self‐regulating continuous‐flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) via VML and evaluate the accuracy of the VML compared with an in vivo acute animal study. The VML reproduced 124 hemodynamic conditions from three acute in vivo experiments in calves. Systemic/pulmonary vascular resistances, pump rotational speed, pulsatility, and pulse rate were set for the VML from in vivo data. We compared outputs (pump flow, left and right pump pressure rises, and atrial pressure difference) between the two systems. The pump performance curves all fell in the designed range. There was a strong correlation between the VML and the in vivo study in the left pump flow (r2 = 0.84) and pressure rise (r2 = 0.80), and a moderate correlation in right pressure rise (r2 = 0.52) and atrial pressure difference (r2 = 0.59). Although there is room for improvement in simulating right‐sided pump performance of self‐regulating CFTAH, the VML acceptably simulated the hemodynamics observed in an in vivo study. These results indicate that pump flow and pressure rise can be estimated from vascular resistances and pump settings.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Despite the advances in the left ventricular assist device (LVAD), there are still situations that require a biventricular assist device (BVAD) system. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the system performance interactions with the HeartMate3 (HM3) and HeartWare (HVAD) in a BVAD configuration using the virtual mock loop (VML) simulation tool. Methods The VML simulation tool is an in silico implementation of a lumped parameter model of the cardiovascular system with mechanical circulatory support. Patients with ejection fractions of 60%, 20%, and 15% were simulated in VML, and the HVAD and HM3 in a BVAD with ventricular cannulation were applied to simulated conditions. Pump speeds that restored baseline normal hemodynamics were determined. To determine the optimal speeds for BVAD, the left and right arterial pressures (LAP, RAP) were plotted. Results In the HVAD, LAP and RAP are balanced at 11 mm Hg with LVAD 3500 rpm, right ventricular assist device (RVAD) 2200 rpm; at 13 mm Hg with LVAD 3000 rpm, RVAD 1700 rpm; and at 14 mm Hg with LVAD 2500 rpm, RVAD 1300 rpm. For the HM3, at 8 mm Hg with LVAD 7000 rpm, RVAD 5000 rpm; at 9 mm Hg with LVAD 6000 rpm, RVAD 4300 rpm; and at 9.5 mm Hg with LVAD 5000 rpm, RVAD 3500 rpm. Conclusion The RVAD/LVAD speed ratios required for atrial balance were approximately 0.6 for the HVAD and 0.7 for the HM3. However, the HVAD required RVAD speeds below its range of operation.

ObjectiveSevere biventricular heart failure (BHF) can be remedied using a biventricular assist device (BVAD). Two devices are currently in development: a universal ventricular assist device (UVAD), which will be able to assist either the left, right, or both ventricles, and a continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH), which replaces the entire heart. In this study, the in vitro hemodynamic performances of two UVADs are compared to a CFTAH acting as a BVAD.MethodsFor this experiment, a biventricular mock circulatory loop utilizes two pneumatic pumps (Abiomed AB5000™, Danvers, MA, USA), in conjunction with a dual-output driver, to create heart failure (HF) conditions (left, LHF; right, RHF; biventricular, BHF). Systolic BHF for four different situations were replicated. In each situation, CFTAH and UVAD devices were installed and operated at two distinct speeds, and cannulations for ventricular and atrial connections were evaluated.ResultsBoth CFTAH and UVAD setups achieved our recommended hemodynamic criteria. The dual-UVAD arrangement yielded a better atrial balance to alleviate LHF and RHF. For moderate and severe BHF scenarios, CFTAH and dual UVADs both created excellent atrial pressure balance. Conversely, when CFTAH was atrial cannulated for LHF and RHF, the needed atrial pressure balance was not met.ConclusionComprehensive in vitro testing of two different BVAD setups exhibited self-regulation and exceptional pump performance for both (single- and dual-device) BHF support scenarios. For treating moderate and severe BHF, UVAD and CFTAH both functioned well with respect to atrial pressure regulation and cardiac output. Though, the dual-UVAD setup yielded a better atrial pressure balance in all BHF testing scenarios.