OBJECTIVEThe Pediatric Artificial Pancreas (PedArPan) project tested a children-specific version of the modular model predictive control (MMPC) algorithm in 5-to 9-yearold children during a camp.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 30 children, 5-to 9-years old, with type 1 diabetes completed an outpatient, open-label, randomized, crossover trial. Three days with an artificial pancreas (AP) were compared with three days of parent-managed sensoraugmented pump (SAP).
RESULTSOvernight time-in-hypoglycemia was reduced with the AP versus SAP, median (25 th -75 th percentiles): 0.0% (0.0-2.2) vs. 2.2% (0.0-12.3) (P 5 0.002), without a significant change of time-in-target, mean: 56.0% (SD 22.5) vs. 59.7% (21.2) (P 5 0.430), but with increased mean glucose 173 mg/dL (36) vs. 150 mg/dL (39) (P 5 0.002). Overall, the AP granted a threefold reduction of time-in-hypoglycemia (P < 0.001) at the cost of decreased time-in-target, 56.8% (13.5) vs. 63.1% (11.0) (P 5 0.022) and increased mean glucose 169 mg/dL (23) vs. 147 mg/dL (23) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONSThis trial, the first outpatient single-hormone AP trial in a population of this age, shows feasibility and safety of MMPC in young children. Algorithm retuning will be performed to improve efficacy.Only three artificial pancreas (AP) trials have focused on the prepubertal population so far: two single-hormone AP studies, performed inpatient for less than 1 day (1,2) and a recent dual-hormone AP study, performed in a camp for 5 days (3). Here we report the first outpatient single-hormone AP trial focusing on 5-to 9-year-old children.Data were collected in the Pediatric Artificial Pancreas (PedArPan) camp, where sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy was compared with the modular model predictive control algorithm (MMPC) (4,5), running on the wearable platform Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) (6).
Physicians provide different insulin dose recommendations based on the same datasets. The automated advice of the Advisor Pro did not differ significantly from the advice given by the physicians in the direction or magnitude of the insulin dosing.
Participants manifested a positive attitude toward the AP. Further studies are required to explore participants' perceptions early in the AP development to individualize the new treatment as much as possible, and to tailor it to respond to their needs and values.
Aim
To evaluate the impact of a virtual educational camp (vEC) on glucose control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using a closed‐loop control (CLC) system.
Materials and Methods
This was a prospective multicentre study of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the Tandem Basal‐IQ system. Insulin pumps were upgraded to Control‐IQ, and children and their parents participated in a 3‐day multidisciplinary vEC. Clinical data, glucose metrics and HbA1c were evaluated over the 12 weeks prior to the Control‐IQ update and over the 12 weeks after the vEC.
Results
Forty‐three children and adolescents (aged 7‐16 years) with type 1 diabetes and their families participated in the vEC. The median percentage of time in target range (70‐180 mg/dL; TIR) increased from 64% (interquartile range [IQR] 56%‐73%) with Basal‐IQ to 76% (IQR 71%‐81%) with Control‐IQ (P < .001). After the vEC, more than 75% of participants achieved a TIR of more than 70%. The percentage of time between 180 and 250 mg/dL and above 250 mg/dL decreased by 5% (P < .01) and 6% (P < .01), respectively, while the time between 70 and 54 mg/dL and below 54 mg/dL remained low and unaltered. HbA1c decreased by 0.5% (P < .01). There were no episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia.
Conclusions
In this study of children managing their diabetes in a real‐world setting, more than 75% of children who participated in a vEC after starting a CLC system could obtain and maintain a TIR of more than 70%. The vEC was feasible and resulted in a significant and persistent improvement in TIR in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
ObjectiveAfter a previous survey on the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at onset of type 1 diabetes in children in 2013–2014 in Italy, we aimed to verify a possible decline in the incidence of DKA at onset during a national prevention campaign.DesignProspective observational study.SettingMulticentre study throughout Italy.InterventionNational awareness campaign started in November 2015 and held until December 2017.PatientsDuring 2016 and 2017 we collected data on all patients aged 0–18 years with new-onset diabetes.Main outcome measuresDKA (pH <7.30), severe DKA (pH <7.1), DKA in children below 6 years and DKA treatment according to the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (ISPED) protocol were evaluated.ResultsRecords (n=2361) of children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes were collected from 58 out of 68 (85.3%) centres of the original survey participants and 100% of the previously surveyed tertiary centres. Overall, DKA was observed in 1124 patients, with an increased rate when compared with the previous survey (47.6% vs 38.5%, p=0.002), and severe DKA in 15.3%. In children below 6 years, DKA was observed in 323 out of 617 (52.5%) and severe DKA in 16.7%; in this age group, occurrence of DKA reduced by 21.3% (p=0.009). DKA treatment according to the ISPED guidelines was adopted in 95% of the centres, with a 27% improvement (p=0.025).ConclusionsDuring a 2-year awareness campaign, DKA at onset of diabetes in children and adolescents 0–18 years is still common and increased when compared with the 2013–2014 survey.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.