Objectives-This study examined the scanpaths of patients with homonymous hemianopia while viewing naturalistic pictures in their original and also spatially filtered forms. Features of their scanpaths with respect to various saccade and fixation parameters were examined to determine whether they develop compensatory eye movement strategies. The eVects of various lesion parameters including location, size, and age on the evolution of such strategies were considered. Methods-Eye movements of eight patients with homonymous hemianopia (four left, four right), but lacking neglect, were recorded while they viewed 22 images of real scenes, and they were compared with the eye movements of eight age matched controls. Subjects viewed each image for 3 seconds, initially in a spatially filtered form in which much of the semantic content had been removed, and then in their unfiltered, original form. Results-Patients diVered significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters. For fixation parameters patients with hemianopia fixated diVerent spatial positions from controls, made more fixations which were more widely distributed and of shorter duration than controls, and spent a greater proportion of their total fixation time in the area corresponding to their blind hemifield. They did not make significantly more refixations than controls. For saccade parameters patients made more saccades into their blind hemifield, these saccades having shorter latencies and shorter amplitudes than those made into their seeing field, and had longer scanpaths than control subjects. The amplitude of their first saccade was longer than that of controls although its direction did not correlate simply with the side of the field defect. Their mean saccade amplitude was similar to that of controls. Filtering out high spatial frequencies within images seemed to accentuate the described diVerences between eye movement characteristics of hemianopes and controls. Scanpath diVerences correlated with increasing age but not location or size of lesions causing the hemianopia. Conclusion-Various features of scanpaths produced by hemianopes were different from normal subjects. These diVerences correlated with lesion age and may reflect the evolution of a compensatory eye movement strategy. (J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:751-759)

Measurements were carried out of saccadic eye movements made during brief (3 s) examination of images which the observer was asked to identify. Each image was identified in three forms: low-pass filtered, high-pass filtered, and unfiltered. The analysis of the eye-movement patterns was based on the locations of fixations made during examination of the images, for which purpose a least-squares measures of similarity between two sets of locations was introduced. It is shown that there is a high degree of similarity between fixations made by the same observer to the different versions of a given image and that for a given image there is a high degree of similarity between fixations made by the eighteen observers who participated in the experiments. The similarities are greater for the initial 1.5 s than for the full viewing period of 3 s. The similarity between the locations of fixations and those of selected image features such as local contrast, high-spatial-frequency content, and edge density was also examined. It is shown that there is only weak similarity between the locations of fixations and those of any given local image feature, and the tendency of observers to fixate centrally on the image is identified as the principal reason for the low similarity values. It is shown that if the nonuniform distribution of eye movements is taken into account, significant similarities are found between the locations of fixations and those of certain image features, such as edge density.

Eye movements made by eighteen observers in response to brief (3 s) presentations of eleven different images, each in three forms (unfiltered, high-pass filtered and low-pass filtered), have been analysed in order to identify both repeated sequences of fixations and image locations which attract re-fixations. It is shown that eye-movement traces made by different observers in response to the same image have few common temporal sequences involving the same fixation locations, even for sequences of only two fixations. There is a greater incidence of such sequences in eye-movement traces made by the same observer in response to two presentations of the same image, but average numbers are still low. Conserved sequences involving more than two identical locations occur at a much lower frequency, and the incidence of repeated sequences is not increased if consideration is restricted to regions of the image which attract large numbers of fixations. It is concluded that the temporal sequence in which fixations are made is not a significant factor in the analysis of the eye-movement data considered in this report. Calculations based on a least squares index of similarity are consistent with this conclusion. The analysis shows a relatively high incidence of re-fixation on certain locations in the images and there is evidence that such re-fixations are a significant factor in the high similarity between fixation locations established by different observers when viewing the same image.

The analysis of eye movement traces (i.e., the patterns of fixations in a search) is more complex than that of such parameters as mean fixation duration, and as a result, previous attempts have focused on a qualitative appraisal of the form of an eye movement trace. In this paper, the concept of the fixation map is introduced. Its application to the quantification of similarity of traces and the degree of coverage by fixations of a visual stimulus is discussed. The ability of fixation maps to aid in the understanding and communication of large numbers of eye movement traces is examined.

The locations of features such as extremes of contrast or luminance, high spatial frequency content and edge density in a set of images have been determined, and the locations of fixations made by a group of eighteen human observers who examined the images during brief (3 s) presentations were also measured. The similarity between the locations of the eye movements and those of each stimulus feature was determined by means of a least squares index IS. For averages taken over data for all observers, the similarity determined in this way is much lower than values for pairs of fixation locations made by different observers. It is concluded that the pattern of fixations made to a given image which is highly conserved between different observers, cannot be associated with any one of the local features examined by us. It is shown further that the distribution of fixation locations over the images is non-uniform, with a marked bias to central areas, whereas the image features are more uniformly distributed. Weighting the distributions of feature locations to take account of the non-uniform distribution of fixations produces much higher IS values, but the dominant contribution to these high values is the weighting function itself. Only in the case of edge density is there significant similarity between the locations of eye movements and those of the image features.