2002
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye movements of large populations: II. Deriving regions of interest, coverage, and similarity using fixation maps

Abstract: The analysis of eye movement traces (i.e., the patterns of fixations in a search) is more complex than that of such parameters as mean fixation duration, and as a result, previous attempts have focused on a qualitative appraisal of the form of an eye movement trace. In this paper, the concept of the fixation map is introduced. Its application to the quantification of similarity of traces and the degree of coverage by fixations of a visual stimulus is discussed. The ability of fixation maps to aid in the unders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we focused on the overall spatial similarity between regions inspected in the different conditions by using fixation density maps (Wooding, 2002) and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve (t 'Hart et al, 2009;Ehringer et al, 2009;Tatler et al, 2005). This method has become a standard approach for testing computational models of fixation location, and it has a number of advantages because it makes no assumptions about differences in the underlying distributions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Spatial Fixation Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we focused on the overall spatial similarity between regions inspected in the different conditions by using fixation density maps (Wooding, 2002) and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve (t 'Hart et al, 2009;Ehringer et al, 2009;Tatler et al, 2005). This method has become a standard approach for testing computational models of fixation location, and it has a number of advantages because it makes no assumptions about differences in the underlying distributions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Spatial Fixation Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed by D. S. Wooding [15] fulfils these two constraints. In the case of video sequences, the method is applied on each frame I of a video sequence K. The process result is a subjective saliency map S subj (I) for each frame I.…”
Section: Subjective Saliency Map Build Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous approaches (e.g., Barrington et al, 2008;Bruce & Tsotsos, 2009;Buchan et al, 2007;Harding & Bloj, 2010;Henderson, 2003;Kita et al, 2010;Pomplun et al, 1996;Tatler et al, 2010; Torralba et al, 2006;Wooding, 2002), this method does not rely on the subjective definition of ROIs; in fact, it simply does not require the use of ROIs. Crucially, however, iMap offers some advantages relative to previous methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is worth noting that methods sharing similarities with iMap have been introduced by various authors before us (e.g., Barrington, Marks, Hsiao, & Cottrell, 2008;Bruce & Tsotsos, 2009;Buchan, Paré, & Munhall, 2007;Harding & Bloj, 2010;Henderson, 2003;Kita et al, 2010;Pomplun, Ritter, & Velichkovsky, 1996;Tatler, Wade, Kwan, Findlay, & Velichkovsky, 2010;Torralba, Oliva, Castelhano, & Henderson, 2006;Wooding, 2002). Here, we briefly present the characteristics that few of these methods share with iMap and what differentiate them from it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation