The mentor and any other committee members who wish to review revisions will sign and date this document only when revisions have been completed. Please return this form to the Office of Graduate Studies, where it will be placed in the candidate's file and. submit a copy with your final dissertation to be bound as page number two. AbstractThis study examined the effectiveness of the computer-assisted career guidance system, FOCUS-2, on first-year college students' social cognitive career development.Specifically. career decision self-efficacy (CDSE) and assessment of attributions for career decision-making (AACDM) was assessed using repeated measures ANOVAs with a sample of 420 first-year college students. Results demonstrated that FOCUS-2 increased participants' confidence in their ability to make career decisions and altered their assessment of attributions to a less optimistic style for career decision-making.Results also revealed that the amount of time spent using FOCUS-2 was not significantly related to CDSE and AACDM. Furthermore, no gender differences were found for CDSE: however, women had adopted a more optimistic attributional style for career decision-making than men after using FOCUS-2. African American participants also reported significantly greater CDSE and more optimistic AACDM in comparison to Asian American participants after using FOCUS-2. Lastly, participants with declared majors had significantly greater CDSE than those participants who were undecided about their academic major, and those who indicated that they had a declared major, but were uncertain in their choice of major. There were no significant differences found for academic major and AACDM in this study. Implications for counseling and career professionals are discussed.

No abstract

Graduate student peer-to-peer multiple relationships are an inevitable and often unexamined component of training and education in professional psychology. Boundaries and multiple relationships among professional psychology graduate students must be understood and appropriately navigated to ensure the welfare of all. These concepts are explored and applied in the context of the ethical management of peer-to-peer multiple relationships in professional psychology graduate programs. Examples of possible ethical dilemmas and suggested recommendations for faculty and graduate students in professional psychology programs are presented for consideration. Practical implications are also explored.

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between a set of self–efficacy variables and a set of variables assessing attitudes toward counseling. Results revealed a significant relationship between self–efficacy and attitudes toward counseling among a sample of 253 first–year college students. Low perceptions of self–efficacy were associated with a devaluation of career counseling and more negative attitudes toward seeking personal counseling. Implications for these findings are discussed.

No abstract