No abstract

Matrix Extracellular Phospho-glycoprotEin (MEPE) and proteases are elevated and PHEX is defective in HYP. PHEX prevents proteolysis of MEPE and release of a protease-resistant MEPE-ASARM peptide, an inhibitor of mineralization (minhibin). Thus, in HYP, mutated PHEX may contribute to increased ASARM peptide release. Moreover, binding of MEPE by PHEX may regulate this process in normal subjects. The nature of the PHEX-MEPE nonproteolytic interaction(s) (direct or indirect) is/are unknown. Our aims were to determine (1) whether PHEX binds specifically to MEPE, (2) whether the binding involves the ASARM motif region, and (3) whether free ASARM peptide affects mineralization in vivo in mice. Protein interactions between MEPE and recombinant soluble PHEX (secPHEX) were measured using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Briefly, secPHEX, MEPE, and control protein (IgG) were immobilized on a Biacore CM5 sensor chip, and SPR experiments were performed on a Biacore 3000 high-performance research system. Pure secPHEX was then injected at different concentrations, and interactions with immobilized proteins were measured. To determine MEPE sequences interacting with secPHEX, the inhibitory effects of MEPE-ASARM peptides (phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated), control peptides, and MEPE midregion RGD peptides on secPHEX binding to chip-immobilized MEPE were measured. ASARM peptide and etidronate-mediated mineralization inhibition in vivo and in vitro were determined by quenched calcein fluorescence in hind limbs and calvariae in mice and by histological Sanderson stain. A specific, dose-dependent and Zn-dependent protein interaction between secPHEX and immobilized MEPE occurs (EC50 of 553 nM). Synthetic MEPE PO4-ASARM peptide inhibits the PHEX-MEPE interaction (K(D(app)) = 15 uM and B(max/inhib) = 68%). In contrast, control and MEPE-RGD peptides had no effect. Subcutaneous administration of ASARM peptide resulted in marked quenching of fluorescence in calvariae and hind limbs relative to vehicle controls indicating impaired mineralization. Similar results were obtained with etidronate. Sanderson-stained calvariae also indicated a marked increase in unmineralized osteoid with ASARM peptide and etidronate groups. We conclude that PHEX and MEPE form a nonproteolytic protein interaction via the MEPE carboxy-terminal ASARM motif, and the ASARM peptide inhibits mineralization in vivo. The binding of MEPE and ASARM peptide by PHEX may explain why loss of functional osteoblast-expressed PHEX results in defective mineralization in HYP.

No abstract

EMD affects early states of osteoblastic maturation by stimulating proliferation, but as cells mature in the lineage, EMD enhances differentiation.

Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) has been used extensively in periodontal therapy. The rationale for use of DFDBA includes the fact that proteins capable of inducing new bone; i.e., bone morphogenetic proteins, can be isolated from bone grafts. Commercial bone banks have provided DFDBA to the dental practitioner for many years; however, these organizations have not verified the osteoinductive capacity of their DFDBA preparations. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of commercial DFDBA preparations to induce new bone formation. DFDBA with particle sizes ranging from 200 to 500 microns was received from six bone banks using various bone production methods. Different lots of DFDBA from the same tissue bank were sometimes available. A total of 14 lots were examined. The surface area of bone particles in each sample was measured morphometrically and the pH of a solution containing the particles after suspension in distilled water determined. Samples from each DFDBA lot were implanted intramuscularly (10 mg) or subcutaneously (20 mg) into three different animals and tissue biopsies harvested after 4 weeks. One sample from each tissue bank was implanted and harvested after 8 weeks. At harvest, each area where DFDBA had been implanted was excised and examined by light microscopy. The ability of DFDBA to produce new bone was evaluated and the amount of residual bone particles measured. The results show that bone particles from all tissue banks had a variety of shapes and sizes, both before implantation and after 1 or 2 months of implantation. The pH of particle suspensions also varied between batches, as well as between tissue banks. None of the DFDBA induced new bone formation when implanted subcutaneously. Intramuscular implants from three banks induced new bone formation after 1 and 2 months. DFDBA from two banks caused new bone formation only after 2 months. However, DFDBA from one bank did not induce new bone at all. Particle size before implantation correlated with particle size after implantation. However, particle size did not correlate with ability to induce bone. The results show that commercial DFDBA differs in both size and ability to induce new bone formation, but that the two are not related. The study also indicates that wide variation in commercial bone bank preparations of DFDBA exist and that ability to induce new bone formation also varies widely. Furthermore, the results suggest that methods or assays for evaluating the ability of DFDBA to induce new bone should be developed and standardized.

Demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) have been used extensively in periodontal therapy. DFDBA is used because it contains bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), which induces new bone formation during the healing process. Most commercial bone banks do not verify the presence or activity of BMP in DFDBA nor the ability of DFDBA to induce new bone. Recently, we showed that different bone bank preparations of DFDBA, even from the same bank, varied considerably in their ability to induce new bone, suggesting inherent differences in the quality of the material. Therefore, we examined whether donor age or gender contributed to the variability seen with these preparations. Twenty-seven batches of DFDBA from different donors were donated by one bone bank which had been shown previously to supply DFDBA that was consistently able to induce new bone formation. Each batch was implanted bilaterally in the thigh muscle of nude mice. After 56 days, the implants were excised and examined by light microscopy and histomorphometry. Seventy percent of the preparations tested induced new bone formation. Most of these preparations produced ossicles containing cortical bone surrounding bone marrow-like tissue. The ability to induce bone appears to be age-dependent, with DFDBA from older donors being less likely to have strong bone-inducing activity. By contrast, no difference in ability to induce new bone was noticed between male or female donors. The results of this study confirm that commercial preparations of DFDBA differ in their ability to induce new bone formation. In fact, some of the batches had no activity at all. The ability of DFDBA to induce new bone formation is suggested to be age-dependent, but not gender-dependent by our study. These results indicate that commercial bone banks need to verify the ability of DFDBA to induce new bone formation and should reconsider the advisability of using bone from older donors.

No abstract

EMD is not osteoinductive. However, it is osteopromotive, due in part to its osteoconductive properties, but a threshold concentration is required.