Purpose:The development of computer-aided diagnostic ͑CAD͒ methods for lung nodule detection, classification, and quantitative assessment can be facilitated through a well-characterized repository of computed tomography ͑CT͒ scans. The Lung Image Database Consortium ͑LIDC͒ and Image Database Resource Initiative ͑IDRI͒ completed such a database, establishing a publicly available reference for the medical imaging research community. Initiated by the National Cancer Institute ͑NCI͒, further advanced by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health ͑FNIH͒, and accompanied by the Food and Drug Administration ͑FDA͒ through active participation, this public-private partnership demonstrates the success of a consortium founded on a consensus-based process. Methods: Seven academic centers and eight medical imaging companies collaborated to identify, address, and resolve challenging organizational, technical, and clinical issues to provide a solid foundation for a robust database. The LIDC/IDRI Database contains 1018 cases, each of which includes images from a clinical thoracic CT scan and an associated XML file that records the results of a two-phase image annotation process performed by four experienced thoracic radiologists. In the initial blinded-read phase, each radiologist independently reviewed each CT scan and marked lesions belonging to one of three categories ͑"noduleՆ 3 mm," "noduleϽ 3 mm," and "non-noduleՆ 3 mm"͒. In the subsequent unblinded-read phase, each radiologist independently reviewed their own marks along with the anonymized marks of the three other radiologists to render a final opinion. The goal of this process was to identify as completely as possible all lung nodules in each CT scan without requiring forced consensus.
Results:The Database contains 7371 lesions marked "nodule" by at least one radiologist. 2669 of these lesions were marked "noduleՆ 3 mm" by at least one radiologist, of which 928 ͑34.7%͒ received such marks from all four radiologists. These 2669 lesions include nodule outlines and subjective nodule characteristic ratings.
Conclusions:The LIDC/IDRI Database is expected to provide an essential medical imaging research resource to spur CAD development, validation, and dissemination in clinical practice.
The use of mammography plus tomosynthesis in a screening environment resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate and enabled the detection of more invasive cancers. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01248546.
The introduction of computer-aided detection into this practice was not associated with statistically significant changes in recall and breast cancer detection rates, both for the entire group of radiologists and for the subset of radiologists who interpreted high volumes of mammograms.
In this small data set, FFDM appears to be slightly more sensitive than digital breast tomosynthesis for the detection of calcification. However, diagnostic performance as measured by area under the curve using BI-RADS was not significantly different. With improvements in processing algorithms and display, digital breast tomosynthesis could potentially be improved for this purpose.
The purpose of this study was to develop and test a method for selecting "visually similar" regions of interest depicting breast masses from a reference library to be used in an interactive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) environment. A reference library including 1000 malignant mass regions and 2000 benign and CAD-generated false-positive regions was established. When a suspicious mass region is identified, the scheme segments the region and searches for similar regions from the reference library using a multifeature based k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm. To improve selection of reference images, we added an interactive step. All actual masses in the reference library were subjectively rated on a scale from 1 to 9 as to their "visual margins speculations". When an observer identifies a suspected mass region during a case interpretation he/she first rates the margins and the computerized search is then limited only to regions rated as having similar levels of spiculation (within +/-1 scale difference). In an observer preference study including 85 test regions, two sets of the six "similar" reference regions selected by the KNN with and without the interactive step were displayed side by side with each test region. Four radiologists and five nonclinician observers selected the more appropriate ("similar") reference set in a two alternative forced choice preference experiment. All four radiologists and five nonclinician observers preferred the sets of regions selected by the interactive method with an average frequency of 76.8% and 74.6%, respectively. The overall preference for the interactive method was highly significant (p < 0.001). The study demonstrated that a simple interactive approach that includes subjectively perceived ratings of one feature alone namely, a rating of margin "spiculation," could substantially improve the selection of "visually similar" reference images.
Rationale: Studies demonstrating an association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and low bone mineral density (BMD) implicate factors distinct from treatments and severity of lung disease in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Whereas emphysema has been independently associated with vascular disease and other comorbidities, its association with BMD has not been well studied. Objectives: We explored the associations of BMD with computed tomography (CT) measures of emphysema and other risk factors in current and former smokers. Methods: One hundred ninety subjects completed a CT scan, pulmonary function testing, questionnaires, and dual x-ray absorptiometry measurements of hip and lumbar spine BMD. Subjects were classified as having normal BMD, osteopenia, or osteoporosis. Demographic, physiologic, and radiographic characteristics were compared and the association of BMD with radiographic emphysema, airflow obstruction, and osteoporosis risk factors was assessed. Measurements and Main Results: No difference existed in age, tobacco exposure, oral steroid use, or physical activity across BMD categories. Both osteopenia and osteoporosis were associated with the presence of airflow obstruction, inhaled corticosteroid use, and female sex, and demonstrated a significant relationship with the presence of visual emphysema (P 5 0.0003). Quantitative emphysema, but not CTmeasured indices of airway wall thickness, was inversely associated with BMD. Visual emphysema alone was a significant predictor of osteopenia/osteoporosis (odds ratio 5 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-5.25) in a model including obstruction severity, age, sex, and inhaled and oral steroid use. Conclusions: Radiographic emphysema is a strong, independent predictor of low BMD in current and former smokers. This relationship suggests a common mechanistic link between emphysema and osteopenia/osteoporosis.
Purpose
To compare radiologists’ performance during interpretation of screening mammograms in the clinic to their performance when reading the same examinations in a retrospective laboratory study.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted under an Institutional Review Board approved HIPAA compliant protocol where informed consent was waived. Nine experienced radiologists rated an enriched set of examinations that they personally had read in the clinic (“reader-specific”) mixed with an enriched “common” set of examinations that none of the participants had read in the clinic, using a screening BI-RADS rating scale. The original clinical recommendations to recall the women for a diagnostic workup, or not, for both reader-specific and common sets were compared with their recommendations during the retrospective experiment. The results are presented in terms of reader-specific and group averaged “sensitivity” and “specificity” levels and the dispersion (spread) of reader-specific performance estimates.
Results
On average radiologists performed significantly better in the clinic as compared with their performance in the laboratory (p=0.035). Inter reader dispersion of the computed performance levels was significantly lower during the clinical interpretations (p<0.01).
Conclusion
Retrospective laboratory experiments may not represent well either expected performance levels or inter- reader variability during clinical interpretations of the same set of examinations in the clinical environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.