The small cluster size and low Re suggest that human-to-human transmissibility of A(H7N9) virus has not changed over time and remains limited to date. Continuous assessment of A(H7N9) virus infections and human case clusters is of crucial importance for public health.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence and temporal trends of presarcopenia and related body composition measurements.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2006.MethodsPresarcopenia was defined according to the guidelines from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia. Logistic or linear regression models were used to evaluate the linear trend of the prevalence of presarcopenia, obesity and related body composition measurements.ParticipantsA total of 29 947 participants aged 18–90 years from five waves of the NHANES were included in the analysis.Outcome measuresPresarcopenia was sex-specifically defined as having a skeletal mass index ≤7.26 kg/m2 in men and ≤5.5 kg/m2 in women. Body composition measurements, including total body fat percentage, total body fat mass, total lean body mass, appendicular skeletal muscle mass and bone mineral density, were obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.ResultsThe overall prevalence of presarcopenia ranged from 16.4% in 1999–2000 to 14.8% in 2005–2006 (p for trend=0.78). Presarcopenia was stable in both males (p for trend=0.36) and females (p for trend=0.20). The presarcopenia prevalence was significantly elevated among the age group of 18–39 years old (from 11.3% to 14.1%, p for trend=0.04) and among non-Hispanic blacks (p for trend <0.001). Adults aged ≥80 years old had the highest prevalence.ConclusionsThe prevalence of presarcopenia increased among young individuals over time. Non-Hispanic blacks also demonstrated an increasing trend in the prevalence over time.

Purpose: Many evidence-based studies have indicated that cinnamon has therapeutic effects. However, it may not be entirely safe and its adverse effects may be ignored. The present umbrella review was conducted to elucidate the safety of cinnamon.Methods: Pertinent meta-analyses and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials on cinnamon use in humans were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to September 15, 2021. All meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the safety or adverse effects of cinnamon were considered. PRISMA 2020 was used as the standard of reporting (PRISMA registration ID: 286746).Results: We identified three meta-analyses and one systematic review that described the safety of cinnamon. The quality of the meta-analysis and systematic reviews was evaluated using “Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews.” Their quality was rated as low in two (50%) instances and moderate in two (50%). There were no significant toxic- or side effects between cinnamon group and placebo group regardless of dose and duration.Conclusion: There is evidence to support that the use of cinnamon has no adverse reactions. It can improve the health status of patients as an adjuvant treatment. Future studies exploring better profile risks and protective factors for cinnamon use-related adverse effect are needed, in order that preventive approaches can be developed.

No abstract

No abstract