Considerable epidemiological and laboratory data have suggested that caffeine, a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist, may protect against the underlying neurodegeneration of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although both caffeine and more specific antagonists of the A2A subtype of adenosine receptor (A2AR) have been found to confer protection in animal models of PD, the dependence of caffeine’s neuroprotective effects on the A2AR is not known. To definitively determine its A2AR dependence, the effect of caffeine on MPTP neurotoxicity was compared in wild-type (WT) and A2AR gene global knockout (A2A KO) mice, as well as in CNS cell type-specific (conditional) A2AR knockout (cKO) mice that lack the receptor either in postnatal forebrain neurons or in astrocytes. In WT and in heterozygous A2AR KO mice caffeine pretreatment (25 mg/kg ip) significantly attenuated MPTP-induced depletion of striatal dopamine. By contrast in homozygous A2AR global KO mice caffeine had no effect on MPTP toxicity. In forebrain neuron A2AR cKO mice, caffeine lost its locomotor stimulant effect, whereas its neuroprotective effect was mostly preserved. In astrocytic A2AR cKO mice, both caffeine’s locomotor stimulant and protective properties were undiminished. Taken together, these results indicate that neuroprotection by caffeine in the MPTP model of PD relies on the A2AR, although the specific cellular localization of these receptors remains to be determined.

No abstract

Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) have historically enrolled a low number of underrepresented minorities, lessening the generalizability of therapeutic developments. Although there are racial disparities in PD, little is known regarding neuropsychiatric symptoms and other nonmotor manifestations across all races/ethnicities. Objective: To assess minority participation in PD trials evaluating the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms and explore underlying reasons. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for RCTs with a primary goal of treating neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD patients from 2000-2019. The pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) of being white and enrolled in a clinical trial was calculated using the inverse variance method. I-square was calculated as a measure of heterogeneity and meta-regression was used to evaluate temporal trends. Results: We included 63 RCTs with a total of 7,973 patients. In pooled analysis, 11 (17.5%) RCTs reported race/ethnicity. Of studies reporting this data, 5 African American (0.2%), 16 Hispanics (0.64%), and 539 Asians (21.44%) were enrolled. The pooled prevalence of being white in clinical trials was 98% (CI 0.97–0.98, p < 0.001), with 1,908 patients (75.8%). NIH-funded studies were most likely to report racial data when compared to non-NIH trials (p = 0.032). Conclusion: This large pooled analysis found a small percentage of RCTs reporting race/ethnicity when evaluating treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD. There was a disproportionally high number of white patients when compared to African Americans and Hispanics. More studies are needed to investigate this discrepancy and improve rates of & minority enrollment in PD trials.

Since both obesity and osteoporosis are public health problems worldwide, strategies aimed at preventing both conditions should be encouraged during aging.

No abstract

Motor symptoms are a core feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and cause a significant burden on patients’ quality of life. Oral levodopa is still the most effective treatment, however, the motor benefits are countered by inherent pharmacologic limitations of the drug. Additionally, with disease progression, chronic levodopa leads to the appearance of motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Furthermore, several motor abnormalities of posture, balance, and gait may become less responsive to levodopa. With these unmet needs and our evolving understanding of the neuroanatomic and pathophysiologic underpinnings of PD, several advances have been made in defining new therapies for motor symptoms. These include newer levodopa formulations and drug delivery systems, refinements in adjunctive medications, and non-dopaminergic treatment strategies. Although some are in early stages of development, these novel treatments potentially widen the available options for the management of motor symptoms allowing clinicians to provide an individually tailored care for PD patients. Here, we review the existing and emerging interventions for PD with focus on newly approved and investigational drugs for motor symptoms, motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and balance and gait dysfunction.

No abstract

No abstract