Thispaper describes part of a comprehensive joint-industry project on upheaval buckling.It develops a semiempirical simplified design method and detailed design methods based on a new numerical analysis, and illustrates their application by examples.It assesses alternative design strategies, and the implications of strain-based design.
Total Oil Marine have recently installed a 15.3 km long 12" pipeline in the UK sector of the North Sea as part of the development of the Alwyn Field. The pipeline is completely covered by gravel for physical protection. This paper discusses design engineering problems related to anticipated buckling phenomena associated with high oil temperatures during operation of the pipeline. Special studies were performed by LLOYD'S REGISTER OF SHIPPING and DELFT HYDRAULICS LABORATORY concerned, respectively, with buckling and heat transfer aspects of the pipeline design. In addition, full scale pull-out tests were carried out. INTRODUCTION 12" Alwyn-Ninian Oil pipeline The Alwyn North field is located in the northern part of the UK sector of the North Sea, some 160 kms east of the Shetlands and 110 kms north of the Frigg field and has been developed by Elf UK (66.7%) and Total Oil Marine (33.3%), TOM being the Operator. The development plan consists of the following facilities:–one drilling and accommodation steel platform (NAA)–one production steel platform (NAB)–two export subsea pipelines:a 12" pipeline for the transport of the oil production from Alwyn NAB to Ninian Central.a 24" pipeline for the transport of the gas production from Alwyn NAB to Frigg TP-The Alwyn-Ninian oil pipeline is 15.3 kms long and made up of 12" X65 (API 5LX) -0.406" W.T. seamless, epoxy and 2" concrete coated pipes. For physical protection purposes the Alwyn Ninian pipeline is covered by a continuous gravel embankment over its entire length. As such it is amongst the longest pipelines completely covered with gravel in the North Sea. The gravel embankment has a triangular shape of which the height relative to the seabed varies from 1.4 m to 1.0 m and a maximum embankment slope of 20- to meet the requirements of the fishing industry. Design Engineering Problem Due to high oil temperatures to be sustained in operation (design temperature 84°C at riser sea bottom extremity), a potential bar buckling problem induced by large thermal stresses was investigated as part of the normal pipeline engineering design. Lloyd's Register of Shipping - Ocean Engineering Department (LRS) were commissioned to perform a specific study to analyse all the aspects of this potential bar buckling. LRS first findings were that, assuming the pipeline to be an extremely long beam "snaking" on the sea bottom, there was no risk from bar buckling as such. However an increase of the initial lateral deflection would occur which did not induce dangerous additional bending stresses. Such a model was particularly suitable for an uncovered pipeline simply laid on the seabed. This concept, however, did not allow the proper analysis of the local phenomenon, i.e. a straight section of 100-200 m long completely laterally restrained by gravel. LRS therefore developed an alternative model which indicated that the pipeline might buckle locally and emerge vertically from the gravel embankment if the depth of cover was not sufficient.
TA is an over-pressurized well in the field development project located Offshore Peninsular Malaysia. Although the well was drilled as a development well, it also had an exploration objective as it was the first to penetrate the over pressured zones across a fault in the TA field. An initial attempt to drill conventionally resulted in severe gain and loss scenarios across the first of three sands 80 m below the 7" casing shoe, primarily due to weak coal formations. After many attempts to control losses, it was decided to plug-abandon the 6" open hole and to temporarily suspend the well due to insufficient operating window to drill ahead. After a year of suspension, a new drilling approach using a statically underbalanced mud weight (MW) in combination with an Automated Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) system was introduced as the best solution for drilling into the well objectives. During the planning stage, different scenarios were analyzed based on the formation fracture gradient (FG) and pore pressure (PP) estimations. MPD plans were designed based on statically underbalanced mud while drilling, running the liner, and during the cementing job. During drilling, Dynamic Flow Checks (DFC) and Dynamic Formation Integrity Tests (DFIT) were performed using the MPD system to identify and confirm operating window. The target total depth was successfully reached with mud weighted within the narrow 0.35 ppg drilling window (17.8–18.1 ppg). Decision was then made to top kill the well at 1200 m-MDDF with 18.30 ppg mud, providing an overbalanced condition of 85 psi. Open hole logging operations were then successfully executed. The well was then displaced to a 16.30 ppg mud prior to performing Managed Pressure Cementing (MPC). This technical paper aims to discuss all of the MPD - MPC challenges faced and best practices developed during both the planning and execution stages of the program.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.