Objetivou-se, com este trabalho, elaborar um modelo para estimar as exigências de energia metabolizável (EM) para poedeiras leves da linhagem Lohmann LSL, utilizando-se o método fatorial. Para determinar o efeito da temperatura sobre as exigências de EM para mantença, foram conduzidos experimentos em câmaras climáticas com temperaturas constantes de 12, 22 e 31ºC, utilizando a técnica do abate comparativo. A exigência de energia líquida para o ganho de peso foi determinada por meio da regressão do conteúdo de energia da carcaça em função do peso corporal, enquanto a exigência de EM para o ganho de peso foi estimada considerando-se a eficiência de utilização da energia da dieta. Com base no teor de energia nos ovos, determinou-se a exigência de energia para produção de ovos e a eficiência de deposição de energia no ovo. A partir dos valores das exigências para manutenção, para ganho e produção, foram elaborados modelos para predizer as exigências diárias de EM (kcal/ave/dia): EM1=P0,75(165,74 - 2,37 .T)+6,68.G+2,4.O e EM2=P0,75 (163,67-2,09.T)+6,68.G+2,4.O, em que P é o peso corporal (kg), T, a temperatura ambiente (ºC), G, o ganho de peso (g/dia) e O, a massa de ovos (g/dia).

Foram comparados os coeficientes de digestibilidade aparente (CDA) e a qualidade dasfezes de cães alimentados com uma dieta caseira e dois alimentos comerciais, econômicoe super-prêmio. Seis cães adultos foram distribuídos em delineamento quadrado latinoduplo (3 x 3), com três tratamentos e três períodos, totalizando seis repetições portratamento. As médias foram comparadas pelo teste Tukey. A dieta caseira apresentou osmaiores CDA, não diferindo apenas do CDA do extrato etéreo ácido do alimento superprêmio.O alimento econômico foi o menos digestível, gerando o maior resíduo fecal. Oteor de matéria seca das fezes dos cães alimentados com a dieta caseira foi menor emrelação aos cães recebendo os alimentos econômico e super-prêmio, os quais nãodiferiram entre si. O escore fecal variou pouco entre os tratamentos, mantendo-se dentrodo considerado ideal. A dieta caseira pode ser uma alternativa na alimentação de cães.

Improvements in sow productivity have raised questions regarding dietary vitamin D recommendations. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of the housing system with access to sunlight exposure and supplementation of 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol on performance and serum levels of 25(OH)D3 in sows during gestation and lactation. Sows were distributed in an experimental design with two housing systems: gestation crates or gestation free‐range system with external area for sunlight exposure; and two diets: 0 or 50 μg of 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol kg−1. The use of 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol tended (P = 0.052) to improve total born and influenced (P = 0.046) on number of born alive. Litter weight at birth was also increased (P = 0.01) by 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol supplementation; 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol supplementation and housing system (free‐range with sunlight exposure) tended to increase weaning weight (P = 0.07) and litter daily gain (P = 0.051) during lactation. Exposure to sunlight and 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol supplementation increased 25(OH)D3 serum levels when compared with control treatment during gestation (136.95 vs. 113.92 ng mL−1; P = 0.035) and lactation (120.29 vs. 88.93 ng mL−1; P = 0.026). In conclusion, the association of 25‐hydroxicholecalciferol supplementation with exposure to sunlight during gestation improved significantly 25(OH)D3 serum levels and consequently performance traits in gestation and lactation.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the use of antioxidants on the oxidative stability of poultry offal oil used in the pet food industry. Five commercial synthetic and two natural antioxidants were used in the following treatments: Control (CON); CON + (BHT + BHA + ETH95); CON + (BHT + BHA); CON + (BHA + PG + CA); CON + (BHT + BHA + ETH70); CON + BHA; CON + (ASC + rosemary); and CON + (ASC + tocopherols). Inclusion levels were 0.5% for the synthetic and 0.625% for the natural antioxidants. Oxidative stability was determined at three temperatures (90, 110 and 130 ºC). To determine the fatty acid profile, the original sample of the offal oil was considered a negative control. The fatty acids were determined based on the preparation of methyl esters by a transesterification reaction with methanol in alkaline medium, followed by gas chromatography analysis. The different fatty acid types were identified by comparing the retention times of the fatty acid methyl ester standards with the retention times of the observed peaks. Compositional data analysis was carried out. Without the use of antioxidant, induction time is shorter, resulting in lower oxidative stability of the offal oil and consequent loss of its quality due to less time taken to oxidize. The antioxidants used in CON + (BHT + BHA + ETH95), CON + (BHA + PG + CA) and CON + BHA better preserved the essential fatty acids (linolenic and linoleic). Natural antioxidants exhibited higher oxidation, with higher proportions of saturated fatty acids and the worst ω6:ω3 ratios. In conclusion, the synthetic antioxidants used in CON + (BHT + BHA + ETH95), CON + (BHA + PG + CA) and CON + BHA provided greater protection against oxidation and better preserved the essential fatty acids. The natural antioxidants tested in the present study did not provide satisfactory protection.

Vitamin D is an essential key modulator of metabolism in pigs. Improvements in sow productivity have raised questions regarding dietary vitamin recommendations. In this sense, vitamin D serum levels could be limiting to attend high demanding phases. The present study aimed to study the impact of housing system with access to sunlight exposure and supplementation of 25(OH)D3 (Hy-D®) on performance and serum levels of 25(OH)D3 in sows during gestation and lactation. A total of 48 mixed parity sows were distributed in a factorial 2 x 2 experimental design (2 housing systems: gestation crates or free-range system with external area for sunlight exposure; and 2 diets: 0 or 50µg of Hy-D® per kg of diet). Sows remained in treatments from insemination until weaning. The housing systems did not influence (P >0.10) performance traits during gestation nor lactation. The use of Hy-D® tended (P=0.052) to improve total born (17.5 vs. 15.4, respectively 50 and 0 µg Hy-D®) and influenced (P=0.046) on number of born alive (13.4 vs. 12.2, respectively 50 and 0 µg Hy-D®). Litter weight at birth was influenced (P=0.01) by Hy-D® supplementation (20.8 vs. 17.5 kg, respectively 50 and 0 µg Hy-D®). Hy-D® supplementation and housing system (free-range with sunlight exposure) tended to increase weaning weight (P=0.07) and litter daily gain (P=0.051) during lactation. Exposure to sunlight and Hy-D® influenced (P=0.008) 25(OH)D3 serum levels when compared to control (without sunlight and 0 µg of Hy-D®) during gestation (132.3 vs. 116.6 ng mL-1, respectively) and lactation (120.3 vs. 92.2 ng mL-1, respectively). In conclusion, our findings showed that the supplementation of Hy-D® during gestation and lactation has a significant impact on performance of sows and their litters. Also, the association of Hy-D® supplementation with exposure to sunlight during gestation improved significantly 25(OH)D3 serum levels and consequently performance traits in gestation and lactation.