In dairy cattle, mastitis is the most frequent bacterial disease, and the routine use of antibiotics for treatment and prevention can drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The aim of our study was to estimate the levels of AMR of the 3 main bacteria isolated from dairy cattle with mastitis in France (Streptococcus uberis, Escherichia coli, and coagulase-positive staphylococci) and to investigate their changes over time. Data collected between 2006 and 2016 by the French surveillance network for AMR in pathogenic bacteria of animal origin (called RESAPATH) were analyzed. The proportions of mono- and multidrug resistance were calculated and the trends were investigated using nonlinear analyses applied to time series. Over the whole period, the lowest proportions of resistance in S. uberis isolates were observed for oxacillin (2.2%) and gentamicin (2.4%) and most resistance levels were below 20%. The trends in resistance showed some significant variation, mainly for S. uberis, but without a common pattern across the various antibiotics examined. For only 2 combinations of bacteria-antibiotic the trend in resistance showed a continuous increase from 2006 to 2016: tetracycline resistance in S. uberis isolates and third-generation cephalosporin resistance in E. coli isolates. In E. coli, the highest proportions of resistance were observed for amoxicillin (28.1%) and tetracycline (23.1%). Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in E. coli from dairy cattle was almost nil in 2006, but reached 2.4% in December 2016. This increase is particularly concerning because these antibiotics constitute one of the latest therapeutic alternatives to fight severe infectious diseases in humans. Except for penicillin (33.9%), the proportions of resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci were below 11% during the whole study period. Multidrug resistance (isolates with acquired resistance to at least one antibiotic in 3 or more antibiotic classes) ranged from 2.4% for coagulase-positive staphylococci to 9.9% for S. uberis. These findings can serve as guidelines for practitioners in the choice of the most appropriate antibiotic according to the prevailing epidemiological context. Ultimately, our results contribute to risk assessment of AMR and provide a baseline for setting up and evaluating control measures and designing strategies to limit AMR.

SummaryAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) among bacteria isolated from food-producing animals is a growing concern with implications for public health. AMR surveillance is essential to identify resistance trends and help in the design of effective and efficient control strategies. The aim of the study was to describe the antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from three livestock productions in France (cattle, swine and poultry). The trend in resistance to the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in animal health was analysed as follows: amoxicillin (penicillin), spectinomycin or streptomycin (aminoglycoside), tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole/Enrofloxacin and ceftiofur were also taken into ac- These results contribute to risk assessment and constitute objective evidence on which to evaluate the efficacy of control measures implemented to limit AMR occurrence. K E Y W O R D S

No abstract

No abstract

Understanding the factors leading each stakeholder to participate in an experimental trial is a key element for improving trial set-up and for identifying selection bias in statistical analyses. An experimental protocol, validated by the European Commission, was developed in France to assess the ability of the gamma-interferon test in terms of accuracy to replace the second intradermal skin test in cases of suspected bovine tuberculosis. Implemented between 2013 and 2015, this experimental trial was based on voluntary participation. To determine and understand the motivation or reluctance of farmers to take part in this trial, we carried out a sociological survey in France. Our study was based on semi-structured interviews with the farmers and other stakeholders involved. The analysis of findings demonstrated that shortening the lock-up period during tuberculosis suspicion, following the use of a gamma-interferon test, was an important aim and a genuine challenge for the animal health stakeholders. However, some farmers did not wish to continue the trial because it could potentially have drastic consequences for them. Moreover, misunderstandings and confusion concerning the objectives and consequences of the trial led stakeholders to reject it forcefully. Based on our results, we offer some recommendations: clear and appropriate communication tools should be prepared to explain the protocol and its aims. In addition, these types of animal health trials should be designed with the stakeholders’ interests in mind. This study provides a better understanding of farmer motivations and stakeholder influences on trial participation and outcomes. The findings can be used to help design trials so that they promote participation by farmers and by all animal health stakeholders in general.