Phytoterapic compounds have been used in wound healing for many centuries. Nowadays, scientific evidences of phytotherapeutics is a requirement of the legislation. The scientific literature notes the need for healing topics yielding scars that are both aesthetically appealing and resistant. We aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of several doses of T. aestivum extract (2 mg mL -1 , 4 mg mL -1 , 6 mg mL -1 , 8 mg mL -1 and 10 mg mL -1 ) in a fibroblast cell line and the healing process in an in vivo experimental model (New Zealand rabbits). For this, MTT test in 3T6 cells was performed in duplicates using MEM (0 mg ml -1 ) as negative control. Cell viability was calculated as: absorbance average in treatments/ absorbance average in controls x 100. In vivo test was performed in 78 skin wounds in rabbits that were treated with 2 mg ml -1 and 10 mg ml -1 of T. aestivum and non-ionic cream for 21 days. After this period, it was evaluated the histology using picrosorius and Gomori's trichrome staining. Statistical analysis was evaluated using T test (Graphpad) for cytotoxicity assay, Fischer test for the gomori trichrome test (Grahpad) and Kruskal-Wallis (Statistic 9.0) for picrosirius test. The in vitro test resulted in cytotoxicity observed at 2mg mL -1 whereas cells were viable at higher doses. On the other hand, it was observed that collagen formation of wounds was more uniform with this dose than with 10mg mL -1 extract in the in vivo study. Thus, we conclude that the 2mg mL -1 T. aestivum aqueous extract dose was more efficient in the in vivo wound healing study, despite its cytotoxic effects in vitro. Key words: Wound healing. Rabbits. Picrosirius. Gomori trichome. Wheat. ResumoOs extratos vegetais têm sido utilizados na cicatrização de feridas a muitos séculos. No entanto nos dias atuais a comprovação científica dos fitoterápicos é uma exigência da legislação. Na literatura científica se observa a necessidade de cicatrizantes tópicos que proporcionem uma cicatriz estética e resistente. Devido a isso objetivou-se avaliar a citotoxicidade de diversas doses de T. aestivum (2 mg mL 1 , 4 mg mL -1 , 6 mg mL -1 , 8 mg mL -1 e 10 mg mL -1 ) em linhagem celular de fibroblasto, e o processo cicatricial em modelo experimental (New Zealand rabbits) in vivo. Para isso foi realizado o teste de MTT em linhagem celular 3T. Tests were performed in duplicates, using MEM (0 mg mL -1 ) as negative control. Cell viability was calculated as: absorbance average in treatments/absorbance average
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of acepromazine as an adjuvant to ketamine, midazolam and methadone in the chemical restraint and anesthesia of cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. We allocated 14 cats in two groups: group ketamine (GK), premedicated with ketamine 8 mg/kg, midazolam 0.3 mg/kg and methadone 0.3 mg/kg and group acepromazine (GAK), premedicated with acepromazine 0.05 mg/kg in addition to the above-mentioned drugs. At baseline (T0) and every 5 mins up to 20 mins (T5, T10, T15 and T20) after premedication, the sedation score was evaluated at 0 to 24 points. The sedation score was significantly higher at T5, T10, T15 and T20 in both groups. There were no significant differences in extubation times (3.7 ± 1.3 mins in GK; 5.2 ± 2.6 mins in GAK) and the time to reach a score equal to 0 on the sedation scale (88 ± 63.9 mins in GK; 133 ± 39.7 mins in GAK); however, the time of anesthetic release was significantly higher in the GAK than in GK (19.7 ± 6.5 mins vs 11 ± 5.9 mins) (P = 0.023). Sedation was adequate in both groups. The results indicated that the administration of acepromazine did not contribute to sedation in the protocol and could delay the anesthetic release.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.