Previous motor and perceptual tasks have found optimal processing for sound sequences of a rate of around 600 msec. IOI (Interonset Interval). This zone of optimal processing (the rate at which discrimination is optimal) slows with age and is also found with infants. The current work investigated whether listeners "prefer" sequences at the rate for which they demonstrate optimal processing. In the present study, three experiments were done. Exp. 1 measured tempo preferences in adults who listened to pairs of isochronous sound sequences varying in tempo (from 100- to 1500-msec. IOI) and were required to indicate which they preferred. As expected, highest preferences were expressed for the intermediate tempi, supporting the hypothesis of a zone of preferred tempi comparable to the zone of optimal processing. Moreover, this preference for intermediate tempi was not affected by the temporal context (absence of differences between a fast, a slow, and a wide set of tempi). In Exp. 2, the same procedure was applied to 6- and 10-yr.-olds. Children in both groups had systematic preferences for the fastest tempi within a set, and the older children generally preferred slower sequences. Exp. 3 used a preference paradigm for sound sequences with 4-mo.-old infants, comparing sequences of 100- vs 300-msec. IOI, 300- vs 900-msec. IOI, and 100- vs 900-msec. IOI. No systematic tempo preferences were observed. We conclude that tempo discrimination and tempo preference may have some commonality (perhaps related to a zone of optimal processing), especially in adults, but that they also involve quite distinct processes which undergo different developmental sequences. Whereas adults prefer what they process the best, children prefer what is fastest (and therefore more attention-getting), and we have not been able to detect preferences in infants.
An intermittent tone in one ear may induce a large decline in the loudness of a continuous tone in the contralateral ear [Botte et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 727-739 (1982)]. To uncover the basis for this induced loudness adaptation, the method of successive magnitude estimations was used to measure the loudness of a test tone in one ear during and after a single presentation of a brief inducer tone in the contralateral ear. Duration and frequency of the inducer were varied. The frequency of the test tone was set at 500, 1000, or 3000 Hz. Both inducer and test tones were at 60 dB SPL. When the inducer lasted 5 s or more and was at the same frequency as the test tone, the loudness of the test tone was reduced by 80% to 100% while the inducer was on. As the inducer frequency moved away from the test tone, the loudness reduction declined gradually except for a more marked drop at the point where the frequency separation exceeded the critical bandwidth. Loudness remained depressed after the inducer went off. Additional measurements showed that the amount of loudness reduction corresponded closely to the measured movement of the inducer's sound image away from the center of the listener's head (decentralization).
Differential thresholds for 11 tempi (ranging from 100 to 1500 ms between successive onsets) were measured for four subjects using a 2AFC paradigm. In a first experiment, the number of events in the sequence was varied to test whether sensitivity is greater in regularsequences than in simple duration discrimination tasks (only two events). Relative jnd were: (1) optimal at intermediate tempi (as low as 1.5% in the range between 300–800 ms), and (2) decreased as the number of events increased (2 events=6%, 3 events=4%, 5 events=3.2%, 7 events=3%). A second experiment tested whether this higher sensitivity was due to the fact that the sequences were regular or not by measuring differential tempo thresholds for irregular sequences of five events. Globally, sensitivity for these irregular sequences was of an intermediate level between that of the simple duration task and the sequences with five regular events. The results are discussed in terms of the hypothesized ‘‘regularity detectors.’’
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.