1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-6383(97)90049-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tempo discrimination in infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with previous studies that demonstrated the importance of tempo in auditory rhythms perception [Baruch and Drake, 1997;Dalla Bella et al, 2001;Drake et al, 2000;Trainor et al, 2004] and sensorimotor coupling [Chen et al, 2006;Drake et al, 2000;Fraisse, 1982;Large, 2000;Moelants, 2002;Moelants, 2003;van Noorden and Moelants, 1999], tempo was the most influential time-related property both in preceding pilot testing (cf. Supp.…”
Section: Preferred Tempo Vs Not Preferred Temposupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with previous studies that demonstrated the importance of tempo in auditory rhythms perception [Baruch and Drake, 1997;Dalla Bella et al, 2001;Drake et al, 2000;Trainor et al, 2004] and sensorimotor coupling [Chen et al, 2006;Drake et al, 2000;Fraisse, 1982;Large, 2000;Moelants, 2002;Moelants, 2003;van Noorden and Moelants, 1999], tempo was the most influential time-related property both in preceding pilot testing (cf. Supp.…”
Section: Preferred Tempo Vs Not Preferred Temposupporting
confidence: 91%
“…More specifically, we aimed to clarify whether activity enhancement for preferred musical rhythms can be traced back to preferred beat frequency, i.e., tempo. We expected tempo to be the most important time-related property influencing the subjects' preferences (i) due to its prominent role in auditory rhythm perception [Baruch and Drake, 1997;Dalla Bella et al, 2001;Drake et al, 2000;Trainor et al, 2004], and (ii) because it provides the underlying pulse, a beat, people tune in to when listening to music, i.e., it often triggers sensorimotor coupling [Chen et al, 2006;Drake et al, 2000;Fraisse, 1982;Large, 2000;Moelants, 2002;Moelants, 2003;van Noorden and Moelants, 1999]. To this end, we modeled brain data on the basis of individual judgment analyses including all constituents of the musical rhythms as predictors for the subjects' aesthetic judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some work suggests that sensitivity to complex abstract musical structures, such as tonality and implied harmony, changes from infancy to adulthood (Cuddy & Badertscher, 1987;Krumhansl & Keil, 1982;Lynch & Eilers, 1992;Trainor & Trehub, 1992), other findings suggest that children's basic auditory perception abilities function along principles similar to those of adults (Baruch & Drake, 1997;Demany, 1982;Drake & Penel, 1999;Trehub, 2000;Trehub, Bull, & Thorpe, 1984). Analogies between musical motion and principles of physical motion also suggest that musical training may not be necessary for sensitivity to acoustic features of performances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, listening to a 15% tempo change, faster or slower than spontaneous non-nutritive sucking tempo has been found to slow down sucking tempo in newborns and two month-old infants (Bobin-B egue et al, 2006). In addition, a number of authors reported an ability of two to six months old infants to remember a tempo and perceive tempo modifications using a head-turn paradigm (Baruch and Drake, 1997;Trainor et al, 2004;Trehub and Hannon, 2009). Thus, these early behavioral responses speak for an ability to detect rhythm and tempo and violation of these temporal patterns have been detected by electroencephalogram studies in two month-old infants (Otte et al, 2013) and in newborns (H aden et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%