No abstract

IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) and increase the risk of stroke and death. Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation remains controversial for treatment of AF during mitral valve surgery. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of bi-atrial ablation with those of left atrial ablation among patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF.Methods and analysisThe ABLATION trial (Bi-atrial vs Left Atrial Ablation for Patients with RMVD and Non-paroxysmal AF) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. The trial will randomly assign 320 patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF to bi-atrial ablation procedure or left atrial ablation procedure in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of >30 s at 12 months after surgery off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary end point is the probability of freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the probability of freedom from any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs, AF burden, incidence of adverse events and cardiac function documented by echocardiography at 12 months after operation.Ethics and disseminationThe central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the ABLATION trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.Trial registration numberNCT05021601.

OBJECTIVES The short-term results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation (VTSA) with box lesion have been highly variable, and the actual efficacy requires clarification through longer follow-ups. We aimed to report which patients might benefit more from VTSA with box lesion by longer follow-up. METHODS From September 2010 to November 2016, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent VTSA with box lesion were screened. All enrolled patients visited the outpatient clinic and underwent 24-h Holter monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter. RESULTS A total of 91 consecutive patients [age, 58.0 (interquartile interval from 52.0 to 62.0) years; male, 71.4%] with paroxysmal (67%) or persistent/long-standing persistent (33%) AF were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile interval from 36 to 60 months), freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 76.5%, 66.0% and 66.0% for paroxysmal AF and 58.6%, 47.8% and 34.2% for persistent/long-standing persistent AF at 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.017). The preoperative left atrial diameter >40 mm (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% confidence interval: 1.408–5.716; P = 0.004) and age >50 years (hazard ratio: 2.927, 95% confidence interval: 1.359–6.305; P = 0.006) were associated with recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias. In patients with paroxysmal AF and left atrial diameter ≤40 mm (n = 43), freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without AADs was 81.4%, 74.3% and 74.3% at 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with paroxysmal AF and left atrial diameter ≤40 mm, 5-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without AADs was 74.3%, which was better than that in patients with left atrial diameter >40 mm. A larger sample size and improved study design are needed to confirm our conclusions.

Introduction The necessity of complete bi‐atrial lesion created by radiofrequency clamp and pen for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) remains unclear. Methods From January 2014 to December 2018, patients with RMVD concomitant with nonparoxysmal AF who underwent mitral valve surgery concomitant surgical ablation were retrospectively enrolled. We divided patients into Group A (complete bi‐atrial lesion set created by radiofrequency clamp and pen) and Group B (simplified lesion sets created by radiofrequency clamp alone including bi‐atrial ablation with incomplete mitral isthmus line and stand‐alone left atrial ablation) according to the surgical ablation lesion sets. Propensity score matching was applied to analyze freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between the two groups. Results Two hundred eight (38.5%) and 332 (61.5%) patients were divided into Group A and Group B, respectively. In Group B, the proportion of patients with recurrent atrial flutter in the subgroup of bi‐atrial ablation with incomplete mitral isthmus line was higher than that in Group A (p = .044). After propensity score matching, there were 203 patients in each group. Better freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drugs was obtained in Group A (83.1%, 79.6%, and 65.4%) than Group B (73.1%, 68.4%, and 52.7%) at 12, 36, and 60 months after operation (p = .012). Conclusion The application of radiofrequency clamp and pen to create complete bi‐atrial lesion set in surgical ablation for nonparoxysmal AF in RMVD was associated with superior long‐term efficacy.

OBJECTIVES Thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with a limited lesion set led to suboptimal results for advanced paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) or persistent AF. Whether additional right atrial lesions improve the result is unclear. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study involving 80 consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, left atrial (LA) dilation (LA diameter >40 mm) and failed prior interventional ablation (40 patients, 50%) who underwent thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with box lesions (36 patients) or bi-atrial (BA) lesion (44 patients) in our institution. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after the procedures was compared between the box lesion group and BA lesion group. RESULTS Baseline differences included more patients with persistent AF (86.4% vs 47.2%) and larger left atrium [48.00 (44.00–50.75) vs 42.00 (41.25–44.00) mm] in the BA lesion group. There was no difference in procedural complications between the 2 groups. After a mean follow-up of 32 months, the freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 6, 12 and 24 months was 77.2%, 77.2% and 77.2% in the BA lesion group and 69.4%, 50.0% and 40.6% in the box lesion group, respectively (P = 0.006). After adjustment for sex, age, body mass index, LA diameter, AF type, history of AF, and previous interventional ablation, BA lesion was an independent predictor of lower atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio 0.447, 95% confidential interval 0.208–0.963; P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the box lesion set, thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with BA lesion sets might provide better freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias for paroxysmal or persistent AF with LA dilation. Randomized control trials are warranted to confirm the benefit of BA lesion sets in these patients.