Neuraxial anaesthesia for total hip or total knee arthroplasty, or both appears equally effective without increased morbidity when compared with general anaesthesia. There is limited quantitative evidence to suggest that neuraxial anaesthesia is associated with improved perioperative outcomes. Future investigations should compare intermediate and long-term outcome differences to better inform anaesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients on importance of anaesthetic selection.

No abstract

Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and transfusion after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) but concerns remain that patients with severe medical comorbidities might be at increased risk for thromboembolic complications.

No abstract

Through an examination of the implementation of the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act in the state of Mississippi, we explore the adequacy of traditional two-actor principal-agent theory. Using this as our lens, we suggest that the choices made by Mississippi in the area of welfare reform to privatize much of the work and to add several layers to the existing principal-agent relationship substantially reduced accountability and the effectiveness of the monitoring systems. We conclude that not only is traditional principal-agent theory an insufficient tool for understanding the complex interrelationship between democratic actors in this particular case, the decisions of the state of Mississippi to complicate the principal-actor relationship through privatization also undermined the reform effort itself in ways that may have general implications for other like-minded efforts in other policy areas.There are those who are undermining what we are trying to achieve … -Bud Henry,

Background: Spinal anesthesia provides several benefits for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but historically comes at the cost of slow and unpredictable return of lower-extremity motor function related to the use of long-acting local anesthetics. In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial we sought to determine if an alternative local anesthetic, mepivacaine, would allow more consistent return of motor function compared with low-dose bupivacaine spinal anesthesia during primary THA and TKA. Methods: This trial was conducted at a single academic institution. Prior to trial initiation an internal pilot study determined that 154 patients were required to achieve 80% power. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion with use of advanced computerized stratification based on procedure, age group, sex, and body mass index. Following the surgical procedure, motor function was assessed every 15 minutes in the nonoperative lower extremity according to the Bromage scale and discontinued once Bromage 0 was achieved (spontaneous movement at hip, knee, and ankle). Results: Return of lower-extremity function was more predictable in patients who received mepivacaine than in those who received low-dose bupivacaine. Among patients who received mepivacaine, 1% achieved motor function return beyond 5 hours compared with 11% of patients who received bupivacaine (p = 0.013). The mean time to return of lower-extremity motor function was 26 minutes quicker in patients who received mepivacaine (185 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 174 to 196 minutes) compared with low-dose bupivacaine (210 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 193 to 228 minutes) (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes including pain scores, time to participation in physical therapy, incidence of orthostatic hypotension, urinary retention, or transient neurologic symptoms in patients receiving mepivacaine compared with low-dose bupivacaine. Conclusions: In patients undergoing primary THA and TKA, spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine allowed more consistent return of lower-extremity motor function compared with low-dose bupivacaine, without a concomitant increase in complications potentially associated with spinal anesthetics. This is particularly of value in an era of short-stay and outpatient surgical procedures. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background:Tranexamic acid (TXA) is considered safe and efficacious for elective total joint arthroplasty. However, evidence of TXA’s safety in high-risk patients with hip fracture requiring nonelective arthroplasty has been lacking. This study aimed to assess whether TXA administration to high-risk patients with a hip fracture requiring arthroplasty increased the risk of thrombotic complications or mortality.Methods:All patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures between 2011 and 2019 at 4 sites within 1 hospital system were retrospectively identified. Patients were grouped by risk (high-risk or low-risk) and TXA treatment (with or without TXA). Propensity scores were used for risk adjustment in comparisons between surgery with and without TXA for only the high-risk group (n = 1,066) and the entire population (n = 2,166). Differences in the occurrence of postoperative mortality, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke within 90 days of hip arthroplasty were evaluated.Results:TXA administration was not associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications or mortality within 90 days in either high-risk or all-patient groups. Specifically, among 1,066 matched high-risk patients who did not or did receive TXA, there were no significant differences in mortality (14.82% and 10.00%; p = 0.295), deep venous thrombosis (3.56% and 3.04%; p = 0.440), pulmonary embolism (2.44% and 1.96%; p = 0.374), myocardial infarction (3.38% and 2.14%; p = 0.704), or stroke (4.32% and 5.71%; p = 0.225).Conclusions:In our review of 1,066 propensity-matched high-risk patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures, we found that TXA administration (compared with no TXA administration) was not associated with an increased risk of mortality, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, or stroke.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Our data demonstrate a reduction in fall incidence coinciding with the implementation of a multi-intervention fall-prevention strategy. Despite prevention efforts, patients of advanced age, elimination-related activities, and patients in the intermediate phase (late postoperative day 1 through day 3) of recovery continue to have a high risk for falling. Therefore, fall-prevention strategies should continue to provide education to all patients (especially elderly patients) and reinforce practices that will monitor patients within their hospital rooms.