No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Modern people live increasingly longer lives owing to advances in medicine and the application of medical technology, but this has raised many ethical questions regarding the prolongation of life, the right to die and euthanasia. [1,2] In South Africa (SA), it is illegal to terminate a person's life or assist therein in order to end pain and suffering, even for a terminally ill patient. The common law criminalises euthanasia, but allows a patient to instruct a doctor to withhold/withdraw potentially life-sustaining treatment. [1] According to the SA Law Commission, terminal illness refers to an illness, injury or other physical or mental condition that, in medical judgment, will inevitably cause the patient's death and is producing extreme suffering, or will cause an irreversible vegetative condition. [1] In 2011, the Ethics Institute of SA (EthicsSA) [3] conducted a scoping survey among doctors and specialists at two medical schools in SA, in which more than 80% of participating doctors indicated that assisted dying should only be contemplated when a patient is terminally ill, while 12% believed that assisted dying does not require a terminal illness. End-of-life decisions are categorised into the following four practices by the legal fraternity: (i) terminal pain management; (ii) withholding or withdrawing of potentially life-sustaining treatment; (iii) advance directives; and (iv) assisted dying. Patients in SA have the right to affordable palliative care in the case of a terminal illness. [4] Under the National Patients' Rights Charter, published by the Health Professions Council of SA (HPCSA), [4-6] patients have the right to refuse treatment. The National Health Act No. 61 of 2003 [6] allows patients, in writing, to designate a person to act on their behalf when they are no longer capable of doing so themselves. 'Assisted dying' is an umbrella term that entails all end-of-life interventions in the dying process. [3] 'Assisted suicide' means that a person intentionally provides the means for a competent person to take their own life. 'Voluntary active euthanasia' means that a competent person at the end of life asks another person to perform an act which is the proximate cause of death. In this article, the term 'assisted dying' will be used in a narrower sense to refer to both assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia. While studies have concentrated on what qualified doctors think about end-of-life decisions, it is of interest to ascertain the opinions of medical students ('doctors in training'). A study was conducted among medical students at a university in Croatia about their opinion on euthanasia, before and after bioethics education on the topic. [7] Before the course, their attitudes toward euthanasia largely varied with respect to religion and according to whether they were rural or urban. After the training, students were significantly more positive towards euthanasia, and no differences between subgroups were This open-access article is distributed under Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0.

No abstract

No abstract