BackgroundDimeticone 4% lotion was shown to be an effective treatment for head louse infestation in two randomised controlled trials in England. It is not affected by insecticide resistance but efficacy obtained (70-75%) was lower than expected. This study was designed to evaluate efficacy of dimeticone 4% lotion in a geographically, socially, and culturally different setting, in rural Turkey and, in order to achieve blinding, it was compared with a potential alternative formulation.MethodsChildren from two village schools were screened for head lice by detection combing. All infested students and family members could participate, giving access to treatment for the whole community. Two investigator applied treatments were given 7 days apart. Outcome was assessed by detection combing three times between treatments and twice the week following second treatment.ResultsIn the intention to treat group 35/36 treated using dimeticone 4% had no lice after the second treatment but there were two protocol violators giving 91.7% treatment success. The alternative product gave 30/36 (83.3%) treatment success, a difference of 8.4% (95% CI -9.8% to 26.2%). The cure rates per-protocol were 33/34 (97.1%) and 30/35 (85.7%) respectively. We were unable to find any newly emerged louse nymphs on 77.8% of dimeticone 4% treated participants or on 66.7% of those treated with the alternative formulation. No adverse events were identified.ConclusionOur results confirm the efficacy of dimeticone 4% lotion against lice and eggs and we found no detectable difference between this product and dimeticone 4% lotion with nerolidol 2% added. We believe that the high cure rate was related to the lower intensity of infestation in Turkey, together with the level of community engagement, compared with previous studies in the UK.Trial RegistrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN10431107

Finding lice can be difficult in head louse infestation. We compared a new louse detection comb with visual inspection. All children in two rural Turkish schools were screened by the two methods. Those with lice were offered treatment and the results monitored by detection combing. Children with nits only were re-screened to identify latent infestations. Using visual inspection we found 214/461 children (46%) with nits but only 30 (6.5%) with live lice. In contrast detection combing found 96 (21%) with live lice, of whom 20 had no nits. Detection combing was 3.84 times more effective than visual inspection for finding live lice. Only 10/138 (7.2%) children with nits and no lice were found to have active infestation by day 16. We found that the detection comb is significantly (P<0.001) more effective than visual screening for diagnosis; that nits are not a good indicator of active infestation; and that treatment with 1% permethrin was 89.6% effective.

No abstract

In this study, we compared the effects of collagenase and Centella asiatica in the rat model. Twenty-seven female rats were divided into three groups, and two full-thickness wounds were made for each animal. Collagenase ointment was applied topically to Group I and C. asiatica ointment to Group II rats. In Group III, no treatment was applied. On the third day of treatment, wounds on the left side of three animals of each group were excised. On the fifth and eighth day of the treatments, the same procedure was performed for the remaining animals. Indirect immunohistochemical examination was performed to detect transforming growth factor beta (TGF)-beta, endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase (eNOS and iNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor, TGF-alpha, laminin, fibronectin, collagen I, and interleukin-1beta. According to the measurements of the wound areas and wound healing periodo, collagenase was superior to the control group. Immunohistochemical examinations showed strong (+++) iNOS and TGF-beta immunoreactivities in C. asiatica group. eNOS immunoreactivity was moderate (++) in this group. For the collagenase group, iNOS, eNOS, and TGF-beta immunoreactivities were moderate (++). In the collagenase group, while TGF-beta and iNOS immunoreactivities were weaker, laminin and fibronectin reactivities were stronger than in C. asiatica and control groups. Collagenase was superior to C. asiatica according to the immunohistochemical findings. Collagenase ointment significantly improves the quality of wound healing and scar formation and is a more appropriate treatment choice than extract of C. asiatica in the early stages of the wound healing process.

No abstract

Sorafenib is a new therapeutic agent being used in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. The most frequently seen cutaneous side effects due to sorafenib are erythema, exfoliative dermatitis, acne vulgaris, and flushing. Folliculitis, eczema, and erythema multiforme are other, rare side effects of sorafenib. A 59-year-old man underwent left radical nephrectomy due to renal cell carcinoma 8 months ago, and after the operation he received immunochemotherapy and then sorafenib. On the third day of sorafenib therapy his lesions occurred. His dermatologic examination revealed multiple erythematous papules on his neck, arms, and legs and bullae and iris lesions on his palms and soles. He was diagnosed as having erythema multiforme. In the literature we found only 1 other erythema multiforme case due to sorafenib. We present this interesting case to show and discuss cutaneous side effects of sorafenib, especially erythema multiforme as a very rare cutaneous side effect.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, severe cutaneous reaction pattern that, in the majority (>90%) of cases, is related to administration of medication. It can be seen in both genders and in all ages. The cutaneous manifestations of AGEP are usually seen 1-14 days after drug administration. A 39-year-old woman presented to our outpatient clinic with the complaint of generalized erythema, burning, and rash. She explained that 2 days before presentation a spider bite had occurred on her left forearm, after which she had experienced pain and erythema spreading gradually to the left upper extremity. On her dermatologic examination, she had an indurated necrotic plaque on the left forearm, which had an upward-spreading linear erythema. Additionally, she had diffuse erythema on her body and small pustules over erythematous skin, especially located on the left popliteal fossa and gluteal region. Based on the clinical and histopathologic findings, she was diagnosed as having AGEP. Because there was no drug use in her history, we attributed her AGEP lesions to the spider bite. This case is interesting, because the patient also had lymphangitis. Herein, we present the fifth case reported in the literature of AGEP caused by a spider bite.

aspects of the digits (Fig. 1d). SPPK and RTS were the clinical diagnosis. The patient and his guardians refused skin biopsy, and we could not evaluate the skin lesion histologically. The lesion was diminished by 5% salicylic acid ointment in a month.RTS results from point mutations in the cyclic AMP-response element binding protein (CBP) gene itself. 2 As CBP has been reported as an important regulator of involucrin expression in human keratinocytes, 3 an abnormal expression of involucrin in epidermis could happen in RTS. Involucrin, a key cornified envelope precursor protein, is well known to regulate the terminal differentiation of epidermis, and its abnormal expression has been reported in many disorders of keratinization. 4 Considering the point mutations in the CBP gene, the abnormal keratinization caused by an abnormal expression of involucrin could probably occur in RTS. Most SPPK shows a significant increase in the number of cornified cell layers in palm skin, and an early onset of synthesis and altered distribution of involucrin, 5 suggesting the principal role of involucrin in the pathology of SPPK. We could not perform skin biopsy and genetic studies due to patient's and his guardian's refusal. However, the diagnosis of RTS and SPPK may be still essentially a clinical diagnosis. Although SPPK might be merely a coincidental association with RTS, it is possible that the mutation of CBP in RTS caused an abnormal expression of involucrin, and subsequent SPPK or SPPK like hyperkeratosis might have occurred in our case.