Multiple induction regimens have been developed for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, there have been no prospective randomized trials that directly compare these regimens. In this study, we wanted to evaluate the outcome of 50 adult ALL patients treated with BFM (i.e. Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster, n = 20) and hyper-CVAD (n = 30) protocols between March 2006 and October 2012. The median age was 25 years in the BFM group and 30.5 years in the hyper-CVAD group with a male/female ratio of 15:5 and 17:13, respectively. Forty-five percent of the patients in the BFM group and 30.3% in the hyper-CVAD group were <25 years old. The majority of cases were B cell in origin (80% in the BFM group and 70% in the hyper-CVAD group). Complete remission after induction therapy was achieved in 95 and 96% of the patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 37 months. The 5-year survival rate was higher in the BFM group than in the hyper-CVAD group (59 vs. 34%). There were also no complications which could cause a delay during the hyper-CVAD regimen. Both chemotherapies were well tolerated. None of the patients died from drug-related toxicity. Only mild liver enzyme elevations were seen as toxicity in the BFM group; these did not cause any delay in therapy. The BFM regimen seems to be feasible for adult patients with ALL in terms of tolerability and efficacy, especially in young adults.
BACKGROUND: Recent reports showed neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), as a predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in various malignancies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the PLR, NLR, and MLR in a cohort of 186 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. This study investigated the prognostic relevance of NLR, PLR, and MLR in MM patients. NLR, PLR, and MLR were calculated from whole blood counts before therapy. The Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox models were used for the evaluation of survival.
RESULTS: Applying cutoff of 1.9 (NLR), 120.00 (PLR), and 0.27 (MLR), decreased PLR showed a negative impact on the outcome. Decreased PLR is an independent predictor for PFS and OS. There were no significant differences in median survival between the high and low NLR (P = 0.80) and MLR (P = 0.87) groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, thrombocytopenia and low PLR are associated with poor survival in MM patients does this P value apply to thrombocytopenia or low PLR and may serve as the cost-effective prognostic biomarker.
As increased NLR, MLR, and PLR predicted poor clinical outcome in MM patients with autologous transplantation in this study, they may serve as cost-effective and rapidly available prognostic biomarkers for these patients.
Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a challenge after allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, considering the diagnostic uncertainties and lack of established treatment. We report a 43-year-old male patient who was diagnosed as TA-TMA after allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation for a progressive ALK negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma and responded to eculizumab with dramatically improving neurological status and renal function. Rapid neurological and renal recovery achieved after eculizumab could support a possible relationship between complement activation and TA-TMA. Eculizumab should be a reasonable treatment approach in patients with TA-TMA after allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.
The serum albumin (SA) level has been reported to be an independent prognostic biomarker that may serve as a surrogate representative of disease biology in patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, its prognostic ability has not been tested in a model adjusting for comorbidities. We analyzed 200 patients who were diagnosed as having de novo MDS. Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 25 months and median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 24 months. Median OS according to the SA level groups of ≤ 3.5, 3.6-4.0 and > 4.0 mg/dL were 24, 39 and 77 months, respectively. SA level remained an independent predictor of both LFS and OS even when adjusting for the hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or World Health Organization classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS). Our findings indicate that SA level at the time of diagnosis is a significant and independent predictor of LFS and OS even when adjusting for commonly used prognostic systems and comorbidities.
Peripheral blood is the prefered source for hematopoietic stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The efficiency of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection can vary among devices. In this study we aimed to compare feasibility and effectivity of apheresis procedures of the different systems. Two apheresis systems [Com.Tec (Fresenius Healthcare) and Spectra Optia (Caridian BCT)] were used in our center for the collection of PBSCs for autologous and allogeneic transplantation. We retrospectively analysed 190 apheresis procedures performed in healthy donors and patients between June 2012 and November 2014 in Department of Hematology, Dokuz Eylul University. PBSCS were collected by Fresenius cell separator (64 procedure) or Spectra Optia cell separator (126 procedure). Mobilization treatments were G-CSF (26.8%), cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (48.4%), prelixafor plus G-CSF (14.7%), ESHAP (10%) and others. Patient and donor characteristics (age,
Objective:High-doses of melphalan treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma (MM) remains a major treatment modality in suitable patients. A minimal dose of 2x106/kg CD34+ cells is preferred to achieve engraftment. Some patients need multiple leukapheresis procedures to achieve the necessary number of CD34+ cells, but this can cause a high volume of stem cell product that cannot be given in a single day. Whether or not the number of infusion days affects engraftment has not been studied before. We aimed to evaluate the impact of reinfusion of stem cells on multiple days on engraftment results.Materials and Methods:Demographic features, CD34+ cell doses, neutrophil and platelet engraftment days, hospitalization days, and number of infusion days of 149 autologous transplantations of 143 MM patients were evaluated retrospectively.Results:The data of 143 MM patients who were transplanted were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 55±8.5 (range: 26-70) years with a male/female ratio of 91/58. Hospitalization days for all patients were 24±6 (range: 14-50) days. Mean CD34+ cell number was (7.5±5.3)x106/kg (range: 1.5-31x106/kg). CD34+ cells were reinfused in 1 day in 80.5% (n=120) of the patients, 2 days in 18.2% of the patients (n=27), and 3 days in 1.3% of the patients (n=2). For 29 patients, reinfusion was applied in more than 1 day because of the high volume of stem cell product. We did not see any dimethyl sulfoxide toxicity, cardiac arrhythmia, or volume overload complications. Hypertensive attacks during infusion were easily controlled by furosemide treatment. In the group with multiple infusions, the infused CD34+ cell numbers had a mean of (4.8±2.8)x106/kg, and in the single infusion group the mean was (8.1±5.5)x106/kg. There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding platelet and neutrophil engraftment days (p=0.850, r=0.820 and p=0.500, r=0.440). There was no statistical difference between the two groups for hospitalization days (p=0.060, r=0.050).Conclusion:In cases with a high volume of stem cell product to acquire adequate stem cells, reinfusion can be safely applied across multiple days without any delay in engraftment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.