Flooding is a major disturbance that impacts aquatic ecosystems and the ecosystem services that they provide. Predicted increases in global flood risk due to land use change and water cycle intensification will likely only increase the frequency and severity of these impacts. Extreme flooding events can cause loss of life and significant destruction to property and infrastructure, effects that are easily recognized and frequently reported in the media. However, flooding also has many other effects on people through freshwater aquatic ecosystem services, which often go unrecognized because they are less evident and can be difficult to evaluate. Here, we identify the effects that small magnitude frequently occurring floods (< 10-year recurrence interval) and extreme floods (> 100-year recurrence interval) have on ten aquatic ecosystem services through a systematic literature review. We focused on ecosystem services considered by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment including: (1) supporting services (primary production, soil formation), (2) regulating services (water regulation, water quality, disease regulation, climate regulation), (3) provisioning services (drinking water, food supply), and (4) cultural services (aesthetic value, recreation and tourism). The literature search resulted in 117 studies and each of the ten ecosystem services was represented by an average of 12 ± 4 studies. Extreme floods resulted in losses in almost every ecosystem service considered in this study. However, small floods had neutral or positive effects on half of the ecosystem services we considered. For example, small floods led to increases in primary production, water regulation, and recreation and tourism. Decision-making that preserves small floods while reducing the impacts of extreme floods can increase ecosystem service provision and minimize losses. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10533-018-0449-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
When terrestrial areas are inundated stored organic matter in soils and vegetation may be exported laterally to aquatic ecosystems during event-based floods and/or decompose and become a source of nutrients (
Lateral carbon transport (LCT), the flux of terrestrial C transported to aquatic ecosystems, displaces carbon (C) across the terrestrial‐aquatic continuum and is on the same order of magnitude as terrestrial net ecosystem production. However, few continental scale C models include LCT or the C‐hydrology linkages necessary for modeling LCT. Those that do exist, borrow processes and conceptual understanding from watershed scale models, assuming that large‐scale and small‐scale drivers of LCT are the same. We develop a conceptual framework of LCT, which focuses on lateral dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transport (LCT‐DOC), and operationalize it with a coupled terrestrial‐aquatic C and hydrology model. After comparing our model LCT‐DOC to previous estimates derived from a summation of landscape scale fluxes for the Contiguous U.S., we use model experiments to partition the importance of LCT‐DOC drivers including total annual precipitation, air temperature, and plant traits, which interact across regional and local scales. We find that climate is the strongest driver of LCT‐DOC, where LCT‐DOC is positively related to precipitation but inversely related to temperature at continental scales. However, the net effect of climate on LCT‐DOC is the product of cross‐scale interactions between climate and vegetation. Plant traits also interact strongly with climate and have a measurable influence on LCT‐DOC, with water use efficiency as the most influential plant trait because it couples terrestrial water and C cycling. We demonstrate that our conceptual framework and relatively simple linked C‐hydrology process model of LCT‐DOC can inform hypotheses and predict LCT‐DOC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.