The impact of flooding on aquatic ecosystem services

Abstract

Flooding is a major disturbance that impacts aquatic ecosystems and the ecosystem services that they provide. Predicted increases in global flood risk due to land use change and water cycle intensification will likely only increase the frequency and severity of these impacts. Extreme flooding events can cause loss of life and significant destruction to property and infrastructure, effects that are easily recognized and frequently reported in the media. However, flooding also has many other effects on people through freshwater aquatic ecosystem services, which often go unrecognized because they are less evident and can be difficult to evaluate. Here, we identify the effects that small magnitude frequently occurring floods (< 10-year recurrence interval) and extreme floods (> 100-year recurrence interval) have on ten aquatic ecosystem services through a systematic literature review. We focused on ecosystem services considered by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment including: (1) supporting services (primary production, soil formation), (2) regulating services (water regulation, water quality, disease regulation, climate regulation), (3) provisioning services (drinking water, food supply), and (4) cultural services (aesthetic value, recreation and tourism). The literature search resulted in 117 studies and each of the ten ecosystem services was represented by an average of 12 ± 4 studies. Extreme floods resulted in losses in almost every ecosystem service considered in this study. However, small floods had neutral or positive effects on half of the ecosystem services we considered. For example, small floods led to increases in primary production, water regulation, and recreation and tourism. Decision-making that preserves small floods while reducing the impacts of extreme floods can increase ecosystem service provision and minimize losses. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10533-018-0449-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects of water levels on species diversity of silica-scaled chrysophytes in large tributaries of Lake Baikal

“…During the flood, we observed a significant depauperisation in the chrysophyte species composition compared to the previous data. Thus, recent studies demonstrated that the beginning of a flood was accompanied by species impoverishment in plankton communities, even if the silicon and nitrogen concentrations were sufficient for their development (Talbot et al 2018). We suggested that the concentrations of chemical components, including oxygen, silicon, nitrogen, and phosphorous could not limit the development of silica-scaled chrysophytes in studied area.…”

“…The flood pulse concept elaborated by Junk et al (1989) stated that a seasonal flood is useful for river ecosystems and could affect their biotic composition, nutrient transport, and sediment distribution. However, violent floods can be destructive for aquatic organisms (Talbot et al 2018).…”

Mapping the Effects of Agricultural Development to Water Yield Using Remote Sensing

“…Then again, the destructive consequences of floods are well known, which causes loss of lives and properties (Talbot et al, 2018). Nevertheless, agricultural (oil palm) remains the backbone of the Malaysian economy and structural development.…”

Diverse water quality responses to extreme climate events: an introduction

“…3). For example, high-frequency, low-intensity floods enhance many ecosystem services while low-frequency, high-intensity floods generate losses in ecosystem services (Talbot et al 2018). River restoration strategies for reducing pollution from extreme events can be improved by identifying features along drainage networks such as floodplains, wetlands, oxbow ponds, and reservoirs, which enhance hydrologic retention, and lengthen the distribution of hydrologic residence times (Wohl et al 2017;Wollheim et al 2018).…”