Radicalization leading to violence is a major societal issue all over the globe. In order to prevent its increase and expansion, measures need to be taken at different instances and levels. In the present narrative review, to inform evidence‐based practices, we bring together numerous applied recommendations made by scholars studying the psychological underpinnings of radicalization within the framework of the Significance Quest Theory and its 3N model. The applied recommendations target at least one of the three elements of the 3N model (i.e., need, narrative, and network) in at least one of the three levels of prevention (i.e., primary, secondary, and tertiary). In the discussion, we highlight which of these are still lacking empirical evaluation, which might be problematic and why, and how policymakers, practitioners, and researchers can work together to provide an integrative model of intervention addressing both the need for significance and the influence of radical narratives and groups. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

No abstract

No abstract

RESUMOO objetivo deste artigo é apresentar como foi estimulado o processo de um projeto de extensão que preconiza a indissociabilidade entre o ensino, a pesquisa e a extensão. A metodologia do projeto de extensão apoia-se na concepção Freireana de educação, sendo que as atividades de extensão são compostas por encontros com os cuidadores de crianças internadas num hospital pediátrico e no ambulatório de endocrinologia. As atividades desenvolvidas com o ensino aconteceram com o Círculo de Cultura com os cuidadores, nas atividades de formação continuada entre docentes e discentes e com a disciplina de Fisiopatologia de órgãos e sistemas. As atividades de pesquisa envolveram a aplicação de um questionário sobre qualidade de vida de crianças e apresentações de trabalhos em eventos. A indissociabilidade pesquisa, extensão e ensino convoca os docentes e os discentes universitários à articulação de saberes, o saber da experiência, o saber do conhecimento e o saber pedagógico, além de beneficiar diretamente a comunidade envolvida.Palavras-chave: extensão comunitária; educação em saúde; comunicação interdisciplinar.

This study aims to investigate the interdependence between gainsharing and performance evaluation (objective and subjective) in a credit union. There is a recent debate on the interdependence between management control practices, which emerges from the discussion of control packages or systems. This study delves into this discussion by investigating the complementarity between gainsharing (group incentive modality) and performance evaluation in a credit union context, given the need for qualitative empirical studies on this phenomenon. This study is considered relevant because the joint use of management control practices can allow organizations to effectively mitigate control problems such as lack of direction, motivation, and competence. This research promotes insights into management control practices’ operation - given the discussion of complementarity between gainsharing, which is not a prevalent incentive system in most organizations - and objective and subjective performance evaluation. The methodology consists of a qualitative field study in a credit union using data collection, interviews, and access to documents analyzed using an interpretive approach. This research presents evidence on the phenomenon of interdependence between management control practices, adding to the literature by addressing different forms of complementarity between a group incentive system in the form of gainsharing and performance evaluation. It became evident that gainsharing reinforces the objective performance evaluation process by mitigating motivation and direction problems, while the subjective performance evaluation compensates the objective performance evaluation by shifting the focus of the evaluation to the individual's skills.