The larva of the green lacewing (Ceraeochrysa cubana) (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) is a natural predator of eggs of Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae), a moth that sequesters pyrrolizidine alkaloids from its larval foodplant (Fabaceae, Crotalaria spp.). Utetheisa eggs are ordinarily endowed with the alkaloid. Alkaloidfree Utetheisa eggs, produced experimentally, are pierced by the larva with its sharp tubular jaws and sucked out. Alkaloid-laden eggs, in contrast, are rejected. When attacking an Utetheisa egg cluster (numbering on average 20 eggs), the larva subjects it to an inspection process. It prods and͞or pierces a small number of eggs (on average two to three) and, if these contain alkaloid, it passes ''negative judgement'' on the remainder of the cluster and turns away. Such generalization on the part of the larva makes sense, because the eggs within clusters differ little in alkaloid content. There is, however, considerable between-cluster variation in egg alkaloid content, so clusters in nature can be expected to range widely in palatability. To check each cluster for acceptability must therefore be adaptive for the larva, just as it must be adaptive for Utetheisa to lay its eggs in large clusters and to apportion alkaloid evenly among eggs of a cluster.Ceraeochrysa cubana ͉ Chrysopidae ͉ Utetheisa ornatrix ͉ Arctiidae ͉ pyrrolizidine alkaloid T he moth Utetheisa ornatrix (family Arctiidae) (henceforth called Utetheisa) endows its eggs with pyrrolizidine alkaloids [henceforth called alkaloid(s)]. It sequesters the chemicals as a larva from its foodplants, legumes of the genus Crotalaria (family Fabaceae), and retains them through metamorphosis into the adult stage. Both parents contribute to the egg endowment. The male transmits alkaloid to the female with the sperm package at mating, and the female allocates a portion of this gift, together with a share of her own alkaloid, to the eggs (1).Here we present evidence that the alkaloids protect the eggs against a natural enemy, the larva of the green lacewing, Ceraeochrysa cubana (family Chrysopidae) ( Fig. 1 A and B). Specifically, we demonstrate that (i) the larva, in laboratory tests, rejects alkaloid-containing Utetheisa eggs, while avidly consuming alkaloid-free eggs offered as controls; (ii) the larva exercises this discrimination in the field as well; (iii) the larva is more strongly deterred by the N-oxide form of the alkaloid than the free base form; (iv) the alkaloid in Utetheisa eggs occurs mainly in the N-oxide form; (v) the eggs in a given cluster are equally endowed with alkaloid; and (vi) the larva seems to act on this information: it abandons a cluster, no matter what the cluster size, if the first few eggs it samples are distasteful. Materials and MethodsThis study was done at our Cornell laboratories and at the Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, Highlands County, FL.Experimental Animals. Utetheisa occur at the Archbold Station, often in abundance, in association with stands of Crotalaria mucronata, the major local foodplant. ...
The arctiid moth Utetheisa ornatrix is protected against predation by pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) that it sequesters as a larva from its food plant. Earlier work had shown that males transmit PA to the female with the sperm package and that the female bestows part of this gift on the eggs, protecting these against predation as a result. We now show that the female herself derives protection from the gift. Females deficient in PA are vulnerable to predation from spiders (Lycosa ceratiola and Nephila clavipes). If mated with a PA-laden male, the females become unacceptable as prey. The effect takes hold promptly and endures; females are unacceptable to spiders virtually from the moment they uncouple from the male and remain unacceptable as they age. Chemical data showed that the female allocates the received PA quickly to all body parts. We predict that other instances will be found of female insects being rendered invulnerable by receipt of sexually transmitted chemicals.
SUMMARY The opilionid Acanthopachylus aculeatus was shown to produce a defensive secretion containing quinones (2,3-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone,2,5-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone and 2,3,5-trimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone),confirming the findings reported nearly a half century ago in a classic study. The mechanism by which the opilionid puts the secretion to use is described. When disturbed, the animal regurgitates enteric fluid, which it conveys by intercoxal clefts to the anterolateral corners of the carapace, where the two gland openings are situated. It then injects some of its quinonoid secretion into the fluid, and conveys the mixed liquid along the length of its flanks by way of two special channels. Such a discharge mechanism may be widespread among opilionids of the family Gonyleptidae (suborder Laniatores), to which A. aculeatus belongs. In a bioassay based on a scratch reflex in decapitated cockroaches (Periplaneta americana) the liquid effluent of A. aculeatus was shown to be potently irritating. Use of the effluent was demonstrated to protect the opilionid against ants (Formica exsectoides). Wolf spiders (Lycosa ceratiola) were shown to be minimally affected by the effluent (they showed little response when the fluid was added to their mouthparts as they fed on mealworms, their normal laboratory prey), although they proved to be aversive to mere contact with the opiliond itself, and to reject the animal without inducing it to discharge. A. aculeatus may therefore contain distasteful factors besides its glandular products.
The carabid beetle Galerita lecontei has a pair of abdominal defensive glands that secrete a mixture of formic acid, acetic acid, and lipophilic components (long-chain hydrocarbons and esters). Formic acid, at the concentration of 80%, is the principal constituent. The beetle ejects the secretion as a spray, which it aims accurately toward parts of the body subjected to assault. At full capacity, the glands store 4.5 mg of formic acid (3% of body mass), enough for upward of six ejections. The beetle reloads the glands at a rate of 126 g of formic acid per day. For the approximately 500 secretory cells of the glands, this means an hourly output of 10 ng of formic acid per cell, or about 5% of cell volume. Replenishing empty glands to their full formic acid load takes the beetle an estimated 37 days. Replenishing the 0.7 mg of formic acid expended in a single discharge takes 5.5 days.The noted British naturalist John Wray, in what must be one of the earliest references to insect chemistry (1), called attention to the production of an acid ''juyce'' by ants. Such fluid, containing formic acid, is well known nowadays to be ejected by ants of the subfamily Formicinae. Formic acid is a potent irritant, deterrent to vertebrates and invertebrates alike, and it serves ants effectively in defense (2). Not surprisingly, the capacity to produce the compound has evolved in other insects as well, notably in carabid beetles (3). We report here on one carabid, Galerita lecontei, that ejects a spray containing formic acid at the concentration of 80%. We describe the glands that produce the fluid, give details of the chemical composition of the liquid, and as part of an attempt to obtain some measure of the defensive ''budget'' of the beetle, provide an estimate of the rate at which formic acid is produced by the secretory cells of the glands.The study was prompted by preliminary observations by one of us (T.E.) on both G. lecontei and its morphologically very similar congener Galerita janus. Both beetles appeared to discharge formic acid, because they invariably came to reek characteristically of the compound when picked up by hand in the field. It was also clear that both beetles ejected the acid at high concentration, because the discharged fluid failed to turn filter paper impregnated with cobaltous chloride from blue to pink, indicating that it was relatively water-free. The data presented here were obtained almost exclusively with G. lecontei. Where obtained also with G. janus, it is so indicated. MATERIALS AND METHODSStatistics.Values are presented throughout as mean Ϯ SD. The Beetles. G. lecontei were taken in ultraviolet light traps in spring, on the grounds of the Archbold Biological Station, near Lake Placid, Highlands County, FL. The few G. janus that were also used were collected under rocks near streams in Ithaca, Tompkins County, NY. The beetles were kept in groups in containers with soil, and maintained for weeks on freshly cut up mealworms (larvae of Tenebrio molitor) and water. Body mass of G. lecontei m...
No abstract
This study aimed to characterize the chemical composition of Aloysia polystachia, Acantholippia seriphioides, Schinus molle, Solidago chilensis, Lippia turbinata, Minthostachys mollis, Buddleja globosa, and Baccharis latifolia essential oils (EOs), and to evaluate their antibacterial activities and their capacity to provoke membrane disruption in Paenibacillus larvae, the bacteria that causes the American Foulbrood (AFB) disease on honey bee larvae. The relationship between the composition of the EOs and these activities on P. larvae was also analyzed. Monoterpenes were the most abundant compounds in all EOs. All EOs showed antimicrobial activity against P. larvae and disrupted the cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane of P. larvae provoking the leakage of cytoplasmic constituents (with the exception of B. latifolia EO). While, the EOs' antimicrobial activity was correlated most strongly to the content of pulegone, carvone, (Z)-β-ocimene, δ-cadinene, camphene, terpinen-4-ol, elemol, β-pinene, β-elemene, γ-cadinene, α-terpineol, and bornyl acetate; the volatiles that better explained the membrane disruption were carvone, limonene, cis-carvone oxide, pentadecane, trans-carvyl acetate, trans-carvone oxide, trans-limonene oxide, artemisia ketone, trans-carveol, thymol, and γ-terpinene (positively correlated) and biciclogermacrene, δ-2-carene, verbenol, α-pinene, and α-thujene (negatively correlated). The studied EOs are proposed as natural alternative means of control for the AFB disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.