No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The contribution of distinct Ca(2+)-sensitive protein kinases to the regulation of the expression of the synaptosomal-associated protein SNAP-25 was examined in bovine chromaffin cells. Prolonged incubation with high K(+) (38 mM) or 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium (DMPP), a nicotinic receptor agonist, significantly increased SNAP-25 protein and mRNA expression, as assessed by immunoblotting and semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Both stimuli preferentially enhanced mRNA coding for the SNAP-25a isoform. Increase of SNAP-25 expression induced by K(+) or DMPP was inhibited over 70% by KN-62 and KN-93, two Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK) inhibitors, whereas the inactive analogue KN-92 only reduced the expression by 34%. The three compounds also inhibited the high K(+)-elicited [Ca(2+)](i) signal by 40%, suggesting that the effect of KN-62 and KN-93 was a combination of CaMK/ Ca(2+) influx inhibitory actions. Incubation of the cells with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 reduced protein expression elicited by high K(+) by 50%, but did not modify the response to DMPP. Interestingly, although protein kinase A (PKA) inhibition by H-89 did not affect the high K(+) or DMPP-induced SNAP-25 expression, basal protein levels were significantly modified upon activation or inhibition of this pathway. Basal expression of SNAP-25 was also modified by the protein kinase C (PKC) activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, but not by Gö6976, a PKC-alpha inhibitor, suggesting that the Ca(2+)-insensitive PKC-epsilon isoform control basal expression of SNAP-25 in these cells. Taken together, these results provide the first evidence that diverse protein kinases might converge in the induction of SNAP-25 expression in chromaffin cells. The preferential contribution of one or another kinase would depend on the physiological or experimental conditions.

To estimate how monetary policy works in small open economies, we build a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model that incorporates the basic features of these economies. We conclude that the monetary policy in a group of small open economies (including Australia, Chile, Colombia, Peru, and New Zealand) is rather similar to that observed in closed economies. Our results also indicate, however, that there are strong differences due to shocks from the international financial markets (mainly risk premium shocks). These differences explain most of the variability of the real exchange rate, which has important reallocation effects in the short run. Our results are consistent with an old idea from the Mundell-Fleming model: namely, a real depreciation to confront a risk premium shock is expansive or procyclical, in contradiction to the predictions of the balance sheet effect, the J curve effect, and the introduction of working capital into RBC models. In line with this last result, we have strong evidence that only in one of the five countries analyzed in this study does not intervene the real exchange rate, the case of New Zealand.