1975
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90160-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Downs and Steiner analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For proper planning and execution of these, various diagnostic A thorough search of literature revealed difference in cephalometric values of dentofacial relationships of various ethnic groups [4,5]. We conducted a study to know if there were any similarities or differences in cephalometric values of north Indian adults with class I occlusion and …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For proper planning and execution of these, various diagnostic A thorough search of literature revealed difference in cephalometric values of dentofacial relationships of various ethnic groups [4,5]. We conducted a study to know if there were any similarities or differences in cephalometric values of north Indian adults with class I occlusion and …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Thereafter, it has been utilized in various applications, such as; in studying changes during normal growth, [11][12][13][14][15] determining skeletal and dental changes produced by orthodontic treatments, [16][17][18] predicting growth and treatment outcomes 19 , and developing cephalometric norms for different ethnic groups. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] However, there are very little cephalometric norms available for Nepalese population. In 2005, Bhattarai 2 conducted a cephalometric study on Nepalese population using Steiners analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cephalometric comparisons of the dentofacial relationships of two adolescent populations from Iowa and Northern Mexico was done by Samir E. Bishara, and Arturo Garcia Fernandez, found significant differences between boys and girls within each population in the skeletal linear parameters of both the anterior and posterior face heights. 11,15 Cephalometric evaluation of Iranian children and its comparison with Tweed's and Steiner's standards was done by Mohammad Hajighadimi., Harry L. Dougherty, and Farimah Garakani, 16,17 skeletally; there were no significant differences between Iranian girls and boys. However, in the male group the dentition was more procumbent than in the female group.…”
Section: Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%