Background and AimsInclusion of the mesentery during resection for colorectal cancer is associated with improved outcomes but has yet to be evaluated in Crohn’s disease. This study aimed to determine the rate of surgical recurrence after inclusion of mesentery during ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease.MethodsSurgical recurrence rates were compared between two cohorts. Cohort A [n = 30] underwent conventional ileocolic resection where the mesentery was divided flush with the intestine. Cohort B [n = 34] underwent resection which included excision of the mesentery. The relationship between mesenteric disease severity and surgical recurrence was determined in a separate cohort [n = 94]. A mesenteric disease activity index was developed to quantify disease severity. This was correlated with the Crohn’s disease activity index and the fibrocyte percentage in circulating white cells.ResultsCumulative reoperation rates were 40% and 2.9% in cohorts A and B [P = 0.003], respectively. Surgical technique was an independent determinant of outcome [P = 0.007]. Length of resected intestine was shorter in cohort B, whilst lymph node yield was higher [12.25 ± 13 versus 2.4 ± 2.9, P = 0.002]. Advanced mesenteric disease predicted increased surgical recurrence [Hazard Ratio 4.7, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.71–13.01, P = 0.003]. The mesenteric disease activity index correlated with the mucosal disease activity index [r = 0.76, p < 0.0001] and the Crohn’s disease activity index [r = 0.70, p < 0.0001]. The mesenteric disease activity index was significantly worse in smokers and correlated with increases in circulating fibrocytes.ConclusionsInclusion of mesentery in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced recurrence requiring reoperation.

This study confirms that there are distinct differences between the Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis mesenteric lymph node microbiomes. Such microbial differences could aid in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, particular in cases of indeterminate colitis at time of resection, or help explain their mechanisms of development and progression.

No abstract

Background and AimsFaecal diversion is associated with improvements in Crohn’s disease but not ulcerative colitis, indicating that differing mechanisms mediate the diseases. This study aimed to investigate levels of systemic mediators of inflammation, including fibrocytes and cytokines, [1] in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis preoperatively compared with healthy controls and [2] in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis prior to and following faecal diversion.MethodsBlood samples were obtained from healthy individuals and patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Levels of circulating fibrocytes were quantified using flow cytometric analysis and their potential relationship to risk factors of inflammatory bowel disease were determined. Levels of circulating cytokines involved in inflammation and fibrocyte recruitment and differentiation were investigated.ResultsCirculating fibrocytes were elevated in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis patients when compared with healthy controls. Smoking, or a history of smoking, was associated with increases in circulating fibrocytes in Crohn’s disease, but not ulcerative colitis. Cytokines involved in fibrocyte recruitment were increased in Crohn’s disease patients, whereas patients with ulcerative colitis displayed increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Faecal diversion in Crohn’s disease patients resulted in decreased circulating fibrocytes, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and TGF-β1, and increased IL-10, whereas the inverse was observed in ulcerative colitis patients.ConclusionsThe clinical effect of faecal diversion in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis may be explained by differing circulating fibrocyte and cytokine responses. Such differences aid in understanding the disease mechanisms and suggest a new therapeutic strategy for inflammatory bowel disease.

The majority of participants wanted education regarding abortion. Despite being predominantly prochoice, considerably fewer students, irrespective of nationality, indicated that they would perform abortions.

BackgroundThere is currently conflicting evidence surrounding the effects of obesity on postoperative outcomes. Previous studies have found obesity to be associated with adverse events, but others have found no association. The aim of this study was to determine whether increasing body mass index (BMI) is an independent risk factor for development of major postoperative complications.MethodsThis was a multicentre prospective cohort study across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal surgery over a 4‐month interval (October–December 2014) were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the 30‐day major complication rate (Clavien–Dindo grade III–V). BMI was grouped according to the World Health Organization classification. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to adjust for patient, operative and hospital‐level effects, creating odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.).ResultsOf 7965 patients, 2545 (32·0 per cent) were of normal weight, 2673 (33·6 per cent) were overweight and 2747 (34·5 per cent) were obese. Overall, 4925 (61·8 per cent) underwent elective and 3038 (38·1 per cent) emergency operations. The 30‐day major complication rate was 11·4 per cent (908 of 7965). In adjusted models, a significant interaction was found between BMI and diagnosis, with an association seen between BMI and major complications for patients with malignancy (overweight: OR 1·59, 95 per cent c.i. 1·12 to 2·29, P = 0·008; obese: OR 1·91, 1·31 to 2·83, P = 0·002; compared with normal weight) but not benign disease (overweight: OR 0·89, 0·71 to 1·12, P = 0·329; obese: OR 0·84, 0·66 to 1·06, P = 0·147).ConclusionOverweight and obese patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal malignancy are at increased risk of major postoperative complications compared with those of normal weight.

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate the need for testing of implants on bone.MethodsPushout studies were performed with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) and the DHS Blade in both cadaveric femoral heads and artificial bone substitutes in the form of polyurethane foam blocks of different density. The pushout studies were performed as a means of comparing the force displacement curves produced by each implant within each material.ResultsThe results demonstrated that test material with a density of 0.16 g/cm3 (block A) produced qualitatively similar force displacement curves for the DHS and qualitatively and quantitatively similar force displacement curves for the DHS Blade, whereas the test material with a density of 0.08 g/cm3 (block B) did not produce results that were predictive of those recorded within the osteoporotic cadaveric femoral heads.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that synthetic material with a density of 0.16 g/cm3 can provide a good substitute for cadaveric osteoporotic femoral heads in the testing of implants. However we do recognise that no synthetic material can be considered as a definitive substitute for bone, therefore studies performed with artificial bone substrates may need to be validated by further testing with a small bone sample in order to produce conclusive results.

No abstract