BackgroundPatients post total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain at high risk of developing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) during the recovery period following surgery despite the availability of effective pharmacological and mechanical prophylactic methods. The use of calf muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) during the hospitalised recovery period on this patient group may be effective at preventing DVT. However, the haemodynamic effectiveness and comfort characteristics of NMES in post-THA patients immediately following surgery have yet to be established.MethodsThe popliteal veins of 11 patients, who had undergone unilateral total hip replacement surgery on the day previous to the study, were measured using Doppler ultrasound during a 4 hour neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) session of the calf muscles. The effect of calf muscle NMES on peak venous velocity, mean venous velocity and volume flow were compared to resting values. Comfort was assessed using a 100mm non-hatched visual analogue scale taken before application of NMES, once NMES was initiated and before NMES was withdrawn.ResultsIn the operated limb NMES produced increases in peak venous velocity of 99% compared to resting. Mean velocity increased by 178% compared to resting and volume flow increased by 159% compared to resting. In the un-operated limb, peak venous velocity increased by 288%, mean velocity increased by 354% and volume flow increased by 614% compared to basal flow (p<0.05 in all cases). There were no significant differences observed between the VAS scores taken before the application of NMES, once NMES was initiated and before NMES was withdrawn (p=.211).ConclusionsNMES produces a beneficial hemodynamic response in patients in the early post-operative period following orthopaedic surgery. This patient group found extended periods of calf-muscle NMES tolerable.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01785251
In view of the importance placed on the first intermetatarsal angle in the assessment of surgical intervention in hallux valgus, we assessed the reliability with which one measures this angle. The study involved 10 observers of varying experience measuring the angle using a standard technique on 10 weightbearing AP X-rays of the foot on three separate occasions. The margin of error in measuring the angle was +/-3.60 degrees with a 95% confidence interval. Increasing and averaging the number of readings per observer or the readings of a number of observers, reduces the error. Experience doesn't improve reliability. In conclusion, improvement in the reliability of the measurements can be achieved by careful technique, performing the measurements at least twice, and averaging them.
IntroductionThe objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone
substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic
femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic
implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar
to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate
the need for testing of implants on bone.MethodsPushout studies were performed with the dynamic hip screw (DHS)
and the DHS Blade in both cadaveric femoral heads and artificial
bone substitutes in the form of polyurethane foam blocks of different
density. The pushout studies were performed as a means of comparing
the force displacement curves produced by each implant within each
material.ResultsThe results demonstrated that test material with a density of
0.16 g/cm3 (block A) produced qualitatively similar force
displacement curves for the DHS and qualitatively and quantitatively
similar force displacement curves for the DHS Blade, whereas the
test material with a density of 0.08 g/cm3 (block B)
did not produce results that were predictive of those recorded within
the osteoporotic cadaveric femoral heads.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that synthetic material with a density
of 0.16 g/cm3 can provide a good substitute for cadaveric
osteoporotic femoral heads in the testing of implants. However we
do recognise that no synthetic material can be considered as a definitive
substitute for bone, therefore studies performed with artificial
bone substrates may need to be validated by further testing with
a small bone sample in order to produce conclusive results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.