The criteria by which acromegalic patients are considered "cured" after surgical therapy are still controversial. Since the abnormal growth hormone (GH) increase after the administration of some agents has been demonstrated to be characteristic of the tumoral somatotrophs, its disappearance after surgery may be taken as an index of the complete removal of the tumor. Serum GH increases after thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 200 micrograms intravenously), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (Gn-RH, 100 micrograms intravenously), and sulpiride (100 mg intramuscularly) injected during dopamine infusion (DA-Slp test), were evaluated in 68 acromegalic patients before and after transnasosphenoidal adenomectomy, and every 12 to 18 months during a follow-up period of 6 months to 11 years (average 42 months). Forty-two patients had abnormal responses to at least one test before surgery: 32 out of 68 (47%) to TRH, six out of 40 (15%) to Gn-RH, and 20 out of 28 (71%) to the DA-Slp test. Of 18 patients who underwent all three tests, 78% had abnormal responses to at least one of them. Twenty-three patients became unresponsive after surgery, and none of them had a recurrence or became abnormally responsive again during the follow-up period. Three out of six patients with postoperative serum GH levels between 5.1 and 10 ng/ml and three out of six patients with postoperative serum GH levels between 2.1 and 5 ng/ml remained abnormally responsive: one of them relapsed 1 year after the operation. The abnormal responses were lost in all 11 patients whose postoperative serum GH levels were below 2 ng/ml, and abnormal responses were maintained in all the patients in whom surgery was considered unsuccessful because postoperative serum GH levels were higher than 10 ng/ml. The TRH, Gn-RH, and DA-Slp tests should thus be considered useful tools in verifying the total removal of an adenoma. The reappearance of active acromegaly in the patient with low postoperative GH levels, who was still responsive to TRH, should be regarded as a reactivation and not a true recurrence of the disease.
alpha-Subunit and beta-subunit of TSH were measured in the sera of five patients with idiopathic central hypothyroidism due to the secretion of biologically inactive TSH, in seven normal controls matched for bone age and sex, and in five subjects with mild primary thyroid failure before and after TRH (200 micrograms, iv) stimulation. Basal serum alpha-subunit concentration in patients did not differ from that in normal controls (mean +/- SD, 0.40 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.28 ng/ml; P, NS), whereas TSH and TSH-beta were significantly higher in patients (TSH, 1.51 +/- 0.74 vs. 0.59 +/- 0.53 ng/ml, P less than 0.025; TSH-beta, 0.56 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.10 +/- 0.02 ng/ml, P less than 0.001). The concentration of TSH-beta was also significantly higher in patients with central hypothyroidism than in subjects with mild primary thyroid failure (0.56 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.24 +/- 0.08 ng/ml; P less than 0.01), although serum TSH levels did not differ in the two groups (1.51 +/- 0.74 vs. 2.16 +/- 0.52 ng/ml; P, NS). alpha-Subunit was significantly higher in primary hypothyroid subjects (1.50 +/- 0.87, P less than 0.05 compared with patients with central hypothyroidism). After TRH, alpha-subunit, TSH, and TSH-beta net increases (peak) were significantly higher in patients with central hypothyroidism than in normal controls (alpha-subunit: 0.95 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.19 ng/ml, P less than 0.05; TSH: 7.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.8 ng/ml, P less than 0.005; TSH-beta: 0.89 +/- 0.35 vs. 0.22 +/- 0.18 ng/ml, P less than 0.005), whereas they did not significantly differ from those recorded in hypothyroid controls. The beta/alpha ratio, which was 1.67 +/- 0.86 in patients and 0.35 +/- 0.18 in normal controls (P less than 0.005), slightly decreased after TRH to 1.24 +/- 0.78 in patients, but remained unchanged in normal controls (0.39 +/- 0.1). After TRH the alpha-subunit peak occurred at 20 min both in patients and in controls, whereas TSH and TSH-beta peaked at 60 min in patients and at 20 min in controls. One patient was given oral TRH (40 mg/day for 4 weeks). The beta/alpha ratio fell from 1.85 to 0.13. Interestingly, serum thyroid hormones, which did not increase after iv TRH and after the first doses of oral TRH, showed a definite increase. Sera from two patients were filtered on Sephadex G-100: in one of them TSH-beta eluted in the same position as labeled reference standard, whereas in the other one radioimmunoassayable TSH-beta eluted near the void volume. The above data indicate that in patients with idiopathic central hypothyroidism due to biologically inactive TSH there is an excess of circulating TSH-beta and suggest that TRH is implicated in the secretion of TSH of full biological potency.
In order to investigate the possible influence of prolactin (Prl) at the hypothalamic level, serum LH and FSH pulsatility was studied in 16 male patients with prolactinomas, normally LH responders to GnRH (group A): 8 of them were untreated (group A1) and 8 had undergone previous unsuccessful pituitary treatments (group A2). In 7 patients the study was repeated when serum Prl was normalized by bromocriptine treatment (group B). For comparison the secretory pattern of LH and FSH was studied in 6 male patients with non\x=req-\ secreting pituitary tumours (group C). All parameters of LH pulsatile secretion (i.e. arithmetic mean of the single concentration, coefficient of variation from the mean value, frequency of peaks, amplitude of pulses expressed as either absolute or per cent value) were significantly lower in patients of groups A1, A2 and C than in normal subjects and no difference was found between the three groups. Furthermore the 7 patients with prolactinomas studied both before and after bromocriptine-induced Prl normalization showed no difference in all the parameters of LH pulsatility in both conditions. No significant abnormalities of FSH secretory pattern were found in the patients of groups A1, A2, B and C in comparison to normal subjects. In all groups of patients mean serum testosterone basal levels were significantly lower than in normals, while the mean oestradiol-17\g=b\ basal concentration was normal. The abnormalities in LH pulsatility found in untreated and bromocriptine-treated patients with prolactinomas and in patients with non-secreting tumours indicate an impairment of GnRH release in such patients; these findings suggest that Prl excess is not the only cause of the abnormalities in LH pulsatile secretion.
Abstract. The influence of β-adrenergic blockade by oral propranolol on the variability of GH responses to GHRH and on GH responsiveness to repeated GHRH administrations was investigated. Eight normal volunteers underwent three tests on three separate occasions. Each test consisted of two administrations of 80 μg GHRH at 2-h intervals without other medication (test 1) or combined with oral administration of 80 mg propranolol 90 min before the first (test 2) or the second GHRH injection (test 3). In test 1 GH levels increased significantly after the first, but not the second GHRH bolus (net incremental area under the curve [nAUC], mean ± sd: 1453 ± 974 and 178 ± 309 μg·l−1·(120 min)−1, respectively). In test 2 basal GH secretion was not influenced by propranolol administration, whereas the GH response to the first GHRH injection was significantly greater than in test 1 (2327 ± 1814 μg·l−1·(120 min)−1; p<0.05). However, individual subjects showed the same variability of GH response as in test 1. The GH response to the second GHRH bolus remained negligible. In test 3 administration of propranolol 90 min before the second GHRH bolus led to a clear GH increase (690±1002 μg·l−1·(120 min)−1), not significantly different from the GH response to the first bolus (1796±1375 μg·l−1·(120 min)−1). However, only 4 subjects showed a marked restoration of the GH responsiveness to the second GHRH administration. In conclusion, oral administration of propranolol is able to increase GH responsiveness to GHRH without changing the great individual variability. The response to a repeated GHRH stimulation is only partially restored by propranolol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.