Background: This study was conducted to elucidate the spectrum of community acquired acute bacterial peritonitis, the role of microbiological culture in its management and other

Laparoscopic duodenojejunal with sleeve gastrectomy, a procedure which combines the principles and advantages of sleeve gastrectomy and foregut hypothesis, is a safe and effective alternative to gastric bypass in weight reduction and resolution of co-morbidities especially for Asian countries. But, long-term follow-up is required.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) remained a formidable challenge owing to retroperitoneal location, difficult dissection near great vessels and critical intracorporeal anastomoses. Recent reviews of literature have established the feasibility and comparable short term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). This study was undertaken to compare the pathological radicality of LPD with OPD. A prospective database of all patients who underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy from Mar 2006 to Feb 2011 was taken up for this study. 45 patients who underwent LPD and 118 patients who underwent OPD for periampullary and pancreatic head malignancy were taken up for analysis. The study groups were comparable in terms of age of presentation, ASA grades, comorbidity, type of surgery and BMI. There was no statistically significant difference with regard to tumor size, lymph node yield, node positivity rates, R1 rates and margin lengths. The pathological radicality of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is comparable with that of open approach when performed by experienced minimal-access surgeons. Standardized protocols for evaluation of the resection margins should be mandatory in studies reporting outcomes of pancreaticoduodectomy.

INTRODUCTIONPancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) is the standard treatment for operable carcinomas of the head of the pancreas, periampullary tumors and in some cases of chronic pancreatitis. Advances in surgical skills and postoperative care have resulted in mortality rates of less than 5%.1 Despite significant improvements in the safety and efficacy of pancreatic surgery, morbidity still remains high in the range of 30% to 65%.2 Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and Postoperative Pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the major causes of morbidity.The exact cause of DGE following pancreaticoduodenectomy is not known. It appears to be multifactorial. [3][4][5] Technical factors in the construction of gastroenterostomy have been implicated in the development of DGE. Significant edema or kinking at this anastomosis may be a factor in the development of DGE. 6 ABSTRACT Background: Morbidity following Pancreaticoduodenectomy still remains high. Few studies have shown decrease in morbidity with the addition of Braun Enteroenterostomy (BEE). Aim of the present study was to determine any possible benefit with addition of BE to the standard reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, all patients who underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy from June 2012 to July 2016 were included. They were randomized to undergo either standard reconstruction (Group A) or with addition of Braun Enteroenterostomy to standard reconstruction (Group B). Outcomes were compared between 2 groups and the results were analyzed. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: 104 patients were included in the study. Group A included 56 patients who underwent standard reconstruction and Group B had 48 patients who had addition of BEE to standard reconstruction. The demographic profile, tumour characteristics, and biochemical profile were similar in 2 groups. Mean operating time and Intra operative blood loss were similar. The incidence of pancreatic fistula (POPF) did not differ significantly in 2 groups (14/56, 25% in group A versus 8/48, 16.6% in group B; p = 0.42). The incidence of Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) was not statistically different in 2 groups (20/56, 35.7% in group A versus 12/48, 25% in group B; p=0.77). Infection rates were similar in two groups. Mean hospital stay was similar in both groups (11.2 days versus 10.7 days; p=0.68). Conclusions:The outcomes of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy were not altered by addition of Braun Enteroenterostomy to standard reconstruction.

No abstract