“…In analysis of the literature recently done by Barisic and Krivokapic [7], adynamic graciloplasty was effective in on an average 50% of cases, dynamic -approximately 60%, so hardly there was any difference again. Up to date, favourable reports are published in the literature on success of adynamic graciloplasty, mostly from Asia, though as a rule with small sample size and retrospective in nature [8][9][10]. In our case, as well demonstrated by Shi et al [9], we used v type of graciloplasty in order to avoid postoperative defecation problems, and we were able to record successful functional outcome.…”