SummaryThe magnitude of the cyclic load applied to the teat apex by the collapsed liner during milking was estimated by measuring the pressure required to cause retrograde flow of milk into the teat canal from a manometer attached to the external teat orifice. The study was extended by observation of the milk flow cycle within a transparent teatcup assembly and by pressure recordings within the teat canal using a catheter-tip transducer. The source of the force compressing the teat is the small airspace, within the collapsed liner, directly below the teat apex. The total force generated is determined mainly by the size of this airspace and the pressure difference (PD) acting across the opposing liner walls. When the PD reached 80–90% of the liner vacuum, the load was just sufficient to occlude the teat canal. Further increase in PD provided the compressive load capable of offsetting vascular congestion of the teat apex. Increasing liner tension increased the load applied. The narrow range of compressive loads applied by conventional liners (5–12 kPa above atmospheric pressure) may be sufficient to offset congestion and oedema in the teat. Loads greater than the mean arterial pressure within the teat apex might serve only to expose the tissues to non-productive compression.

Large differences in new infection rates occurred with half-udder milking machines in which one half of the cluster operated substantially free from vacuum fluctuations while the other half was subjected to various combinations of different types of fluctuation in vacuum. To increase the rate of new infection all teats were contaminated before and after each milking by immersion in a suspension of Streptococcus agalactiae and Str. dysgalactiae. A series of short-duration trials indicated that neither irregular nor cyclic fluctuations in vacuum acting alone were able to increase new infection rate. However, either the Nyhan and Cowhig irregular fluctuation, or a variant of it in combination with cyclic fluctuations in vacuum, was able to do so under the particular experimental conditions used.

SummaryFor radiographic studies of the teat and teatcup liner during milking, quarters were infused with a suspension of propyliodone in milk. Simultaneous recordings of vacuum within the liner, in the mouthpiece chamber and in the pulsation chamber, and recordings of liner-wall movement, were made in conjunction with the radiographs.The studies indicated that the sudden decline in milk flow-rate at the end of the period of peak flow-rate from each quarter, and the concurrent changes in the appearance and position of the teat in the liner, result from a fall in teat sinus pressure. This fall in pressure follows the partial closing of the milk passageway between the teat and udder sinuses. The changes initiating the closing of this connexion seem to occur above the teatcup and are associated with the declining amount of milk in the udder.The teat is elongated by 33–50% as it enters the liner and further stretching of the skin of the teat throughout milking is negligible. Thus, increase in the depth of penetration of the teat into the liner is due to more of the teat entering the top of the liner.The force exerted on the teat by the closed liner, which is greatest near the end of the teat, usually appears to increase near the end of milking. The force acting against the inner surface of the open liner barrel is greatest during the peak flow-rate period and it appears to be fairly uniform over most of the area of contact.

SummaryFrom a series of short-term experiments under accentuated milking machine conditions predisposing to new mastitis infections, it appears that the cow is at increased risk near the end of a milking. The observations recorded are consistent with the view that bacteria implanted in the teat during milking as a result of the action of the machine are the less likely to be washed out the nearer implantation occurs to the end of milk flow.

Four studies are described of the role of friction in maintaining the teatcup stable on the teat. Measurements of the coefficient of friction between teats and pieces of liners, in which most values for the coefficient fell between 0-5 and 1-0, indicated that friction between skin and rubber-like materials was consistent with the general frictional behaviour of elastic solids. Studies during milking showed that the sudden restriction of milk flow that normally occurs near the end of milking is accompanied by a marked fall in the frictional force between the teat and barrel of the open liner. During the period of peak milk flow-rate, the major source of friction maintaining the teatcup stable on the teat is the large area of contact between the teat and liner barrel. The frictional force is derived from the pressure difference across the teat wall which presses the teat against the comparatively rigid liner. Frictional force between the teat and barrel increases after the start of milking because the coefficient of friction rises as one surface gradually moulds to the other. In addition, the total frictional force increases because of the increasing area of contact whenever the teat moves deeper into the liner, until the end of the peak flow-rate period. When this period ends, friction between the teat and open barrel is reduced suddenly because the teat sinus pressure falls. After this stage, the main source of friction appears to be derived from the force between the teat and mouthpiece lip.When a teatcup assembly is in place on a teat during milking, there are opposing forces acting both to remove the liner from the teat and also to cause the teat to move farther into the liner. The force tending to separate the teat and liner is due to the weight of the teatcup assembly. The opposing force tending to thrust the teat deeper into the liner is proportional to the vacuum level in the liner and the crosssectional area of the teat exposed to the vacuum. Generally, this force is greater than the force due to weight when the liner is open, but less when it is closed. Clearly, a source of additional force is required to stop the teatcup moving up or down the teat. Recently, it was reported that frictional properties of liners appeared to have an important and progressively increasing influence on the depth of penetration of the teat in the liner during the course of a milking (Mein et al. 1970). Four subsequent studies of the role of friction in maintaining the teatcup stable on the teat are described in this paper.