At the beginning of the 21st century, Latin America experienced an almost synchronized political change in many counties in what turned out to be known as the "Pink tide" for which many progressivists governments came to power. After almost two decades of pernicious neoliberalism and the production of millions of extremely poor individuals, new winds blowed in the region. The present dissertation sought to present the influence of Chavism and Lulism, as political phenomena, in regional integration through two international organizations: the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America-Treaty of Peoples Trade (ALBA-TCP). In developing a comparative study between these two phenomena, we sought to analyze the antecedents of Lullism and Chavism, as well as its characteristics as a government, especially their regional foreign policy. It was identified, therefore, that these governments had some similars goals in foreign policy being regional integration one of them. However, they aimed to set a new standard on cooperation processes by adopting a post-neoliberal or post-hegemonic regionalism. These new integrationist attempts were based subjects other than economic and commercial ones but prioritized education, health, social security and development, infrastructure, regional peace and security, and conflict resolution fields. Brazil and Venezuela have sought to extend their zones of influence in South America and the Caribbean through regional integration. They do it by what we call a strategic voluntarism by which they calculate the costs and benefits by sponsoring Latin American integration. Due to the state-oriented characteristics of these governments intergovernmentalism theory looks like the most feasible to understand the absence of assignment of sovereignty to UNASUR and ALBA. A factor that has a direct impact to mesure the consolidation of a potential model of regional governance.
Interessada em divulgar pesquisas, análises teóricas e interpretações críticas sobre a realidade latino-americana e caribenha, a BJLAS vem recebendo cada vez mais propostas de artigos cujas temáticas originais exigem diálogos interdisciplinares entre as diversas ciências sociais e as artes. Aqui, a epidemia da COVID-19 é o bastidor de estudos sobre a crise do novo constitucionalismo, das lutas indígenas e do teatro nas redes virtuais. A de políticas sociais dialoga neste número com a política externa, com o feminismo latino-americano e com as constituições. A ausência de democracia e o autoritarismo do Estado, aqui, são retratados no trabalho sobre as atuações femininas contra a violência de Estado ou pela trilha da música brasileira inspirada na Revolução cubana.
Thinking critically about Latin America: Letter to readersThe Brazilian Journal of Latin American Studies, BJLAS, is pleased to present its 39th edition with a set of articles that allow it to consolidate its editorial and intellectual project based on analyzes in five fields of knowledge: Latin American thought; culture, art and literature; society, State and public policy, and international relations.We open this issue with four articles that portray moments of thought produced in and about Latin America from different paradigms, whose common axis is the purpose of creating local knowledge in dialogue and/or tension with Eurocentered knowledge.The first contribution we present in BJLAS is the critical and excellent review of the unique analyzes of Latin American modernity, which were elaborated by the Ecuadorian philosopher Bolívar Echeverría .From a Marxist perspective, Echeverría performs one of the most creative interpretations of Latin American modernity -baroque modernity -as an aesthetic experience of cultural miscegenation and resistance to capitalist modernity and that of fetishized productions. "BOLÍVAR ECHEVERRÍA:
Por uma integração descolonizada Carta às leitoras e aos leitoresA Brazilian Journal of Latin American Studies tem o prazer de apresentar sua edição 42 com novidades no conteúdo e na proposta editorial. Além dos artigos e das resenhas semestrais que oferecem análises e interpretações sobre a América Latina e o Caribe nos diversos campos das ciências sociais e humanidades, esta nova edição da BJLAS inclui um bloco temático de artigos sobre Relações Internacionais e Cultura, além de entrevistas e, inclusive, uma Conferência magistral sobre o tema. Deste modo, a BJLAS abre espaço para novos formatos de análises e diálogos transversais de saberes, harmonizando-nos com os desafios da descolonização epistêmica.Na edição 42 da BJLAS, a Cultura é levada ao debate Político entre os Estados da região e é transformada em estratégia de diálogo entre os países que buscam um modo particular de solidariedade e de maior autonomia regional. Para tal, o cenário dos artigos apresentados é dos
The role of the State: economic development and respect to human rights, a necessary debate (Letter to the readers) The Brazilian Journal of Latin American Studies (BJLAS) is specialized in disseminating scientific knowledge about Latin America and the Caribbean in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities. Aligned with the intellectual project of the Latin America's Integration Inter-Units Graduate Program (PROLAM/USP), BJLAS's editorial line takes the integration of countries in the region beyond interstate relations, also seeking to articulate the scientific and intellectual production of Latin American thinkers and researchers. BJLAS issue 41 highlights the work of authors who debate the centrality of the role of the State in consolidating -or dismantling -national development and human rights.The scenario in which the first is inserted in is the international system of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in which, in a public hearing, sectors of the Bolivian indigenous movement denounce the State for disrespecting the Plurinational Constitution regarding the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.