While additive manufacturing allows more complex shapes than conventional manufacturing processes, there is a clear benefit in leveraging both new and old processes in the definition of new parts. For example, one could create complex part shapes where the main “body” is defined by extrusion and machining, while small protruding features are defined by additive manufacturing. This paper looks at how optimization and geometric reasoning can be combined to identify optimal separation planes within a complex three-dimensional shapes. These separations indicate the joining processes in reverse. The optimization method presents possible manufacturing alternatives to an engineering designer where optimality is defined as a minimization of cost. The process identifies the cutting planes as well as the combination of processes required to join the individual parts together. The paper presents several examples of complex shapes and describes how the optimization finds the optimal results.
While additive manufacturing allows more complex shapes than conventional manufacturing processes, there is a clear benefit in leveraging both new and old processes in the definition of metal parts. For example, one could create complex part shapes where the main “body” is defined by extrusion and machining, while small protruding features are defined by additive manufacturing. This paper looks at how optimization and geometric reasoning can be combined to identify cutting planes within complex three-dimensional (3D) shapes. These cutting planes are used to divide realistic mechanical parts into subparts that can be joined together through additive manufacturing or linear friction welding (LFW). The optimization method presents possible manufacturing alternatives to an engineering designer where optimality is defined as a minimization of cost. The paper presents and compares several cutting planes identification methods and describes how the optimization finds the optimal results for several example parts.
This paper presents a method to decompose three dimensional complex parts into readily available stock material to take advantage of advanced joining to build up a rigid assembly. The method generates many alternative assemblies by decomposing the solid geometry iteratively with cutting planes. Each assembly is then evaluated based on cost. The process continues until the developed search algorithm converges on a near optimal solution. Application of this method will reduce material waste, thus reducing per part processing time, energy consumption, and associated production costs. Example parts for a variety of metals show how the computational tool finds near optimal solutions for complex three dimensional solids.
It is now common for computer-aided engineering tools to show a performance parameter — like von Mises stress — over the surface of a solid part. In this paper, a heatmap is generated for part cost where high values (shown in red) indicate regions with a high impact on manufacturing cost. This is accomplished by slicing the provided part many times in multiple orientations and evaluating the total costs of each side of the part at each slice. The costs from all the directions considered are combined to generate a heatmap to show how different regions affect cost, enabling the designer to make informed improvements to the part geometry. In this paper, our method for generating these heatmaps is presented with three primary manufacturing cost models: bar stock, forging, and metal 3D printing. In all cases, a machining operation is then applied to get to the final part shape. Results are shown to validate the approach and demonstrate its usefulness.
Advanced joining processes can be used to build-up complex parts from stock shapes, thereby reducing waste material. For high-cost metals, this can significantly reduce the manufacturing cost. Nevertheless, determining how to divide a complex part into subparts requires experience and currently takes hours for an engineer to evaluate alternative options. To tackle this issue, we present an artificial intelligence (AI) tree search to automatically decompose parts for advanced joining and generate minimum cost manufacturing plans. The AI makes use of a multi-fidelity optimization approach to balance exploration and exploitation. This approach is shown to provide good manufacturing feedback in less than 30 minutes and produce results that are competitive against experienced design engineers. Although the manufacturing plan models presented were developed specifically for linear and rotary friction welding, the primary algorithms are applicable to other advanced joining operations as well.
Design of closed-die forgings is often too difficult and time consuming to be done early in the design process, but the manufacturing cost is heavily influenced by early design decisions. This paper describes a method for quickly predicting closed-die forging designs from tessellated shape files. This is performed by computationally slicing the 3D solid into 2D cross-sections and applying forging design rules to these cross-sections. This method can be used to identify the best parting line and stroke direction as well as estimate both the forging weight and shape in seconds. This information can be used early in the design process to quickly help engineers make informed decisions and comparisons even before a part design is finalized. Initial results show that this method can be applied quickly and accurately to a wide array of realistic mechanical parts.
While advances in metals additive manufacturing continue to make additive a viable option in more scenarios, these processes are generally slower and more expensive than subtractive methods, like machining. The combination of both additive and subtractive, often called hybrid manufacturing, can be used to get the benefits of both processes, while reducing cost. However, dividing a part into the most cost effective additive and subtractive features is often time-consuming and non-intuitive. In this paper, we present a new approach that optimizes the type, size, and position of a substrate within a part. The resulting hybrid manufacturing configuration enables engineers to reach the most cost-effective compromise between additive and machining. A fully implemented method has been developed and tested on several realistic engineering parts. The results are intuitively useful and push the state-of-the-art forward in generating hybrid manufacturing process plans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.