Volume 2: Advanced Manufacturing 2016
DOI: 10.1115/imece2016-67495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Cutting Planes for Advanced Joining and Additive Manufacturing

Abstract: While additive manufacturing allows more complex shapes than conventional manufacturing processes, there is a clear benefit in leveraging both new and old processes in the definition of new parts. For example, one could create complex part shapes where the main “body” is defined by extrusion and machining, while small protruding features are defined by additive manufacturing. This paper looks at how optimization and geometric reasoning can be combined to identify optimal separation planes within a complex thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such features, as well as less obvious options, can be found by selecting all the faces with adjacent concave edges. Using concave edges performs well in most cases, but Relevant Flats [11] is a more general approach. In this method, a cutting plane is added to every flat that will cut through the solid when that face is extended indefinitely.…”
Section: Right 3 Columns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such features, as well as less obvious options, can be found by selecting all the faces with adjacent concave edges. Using concave edges performs well in most cases, but Relevant Flats [11] is a more general approach. In this method, a cutting plane is added to every flat that will cut through the solid when that face is extended indefinitely.…”
Section: Right 3 Columns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, this approach resulted in nineteen unique cutting planes. Relevant Flats was chosen because it is the fastest of the five cutting plane identification methods presented in [11], however, for more complex parts Area Decomposition [11] and user feedback may be preferable.…”
Section: Right 3 Columns)mentioning
confidence: 99%