Support was provided by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-201502778 to Joy J. Geng. We thank Alexis Oyao and Aditi Venkatesh for help with data collection. We also thank Nicholas Gaspelin and Steven Luck for helpful comments. All data are publicly available in
Our sensory environments contain more information than we can process, and successful behaviors require the ability to separate task-relevant information from task-irrelevant information. Much research on attention has focused on the mechanisms that result in selection of desired information, but much less is known about how distracting information is ignored. Here, we describe evidence that strategic, learned, and passive information can all contribute to better distractor ignoring. The evidence suggests that there are multiple ways in which distractor ignoring is supported, and these ways may be different from those of target selection. Future work will need to identify the mechanisms by which each source of information adjusts attentional priority such that irrelevant information is better ignored.
Implicit learning about where a visual search target is likely to appear often speeds up search. However, whether implicit learning guides spatial attention or affects post-search decisional processes remains controversial. Using eye tracking, this study provides compelling evidence that implicit learning guides attention. In a training phase, participants often found the target in a high-frequency, “rich” quadrant of the display. When subsequently tested in a phase during which the target was randomly located, participants were twice as likely to direct the first saccadic eye movement to the previously rich quadrant than to any of the sparse quadrants. The attentional bias persisted for nearly 200 trials after training and was unabated by explicit instructions to distribute attention evenly. We propose that implicit learning guides spatial attention but in a qualitatively different manner than goal-driven attention.
The ability to suppress distractions is essential to successful completion of goal-directed behaviors. Several behavioral studies have recently provided strong evidence that learned suppression may be particularly efficient in reducing distractor interference. Expectations about a distractor's repeated location, color, or even presence is rapidly learned and used to attenuate interference. In this study, we use a visual search paradigm in which a color singleton, which is known to capture attention, occurs within blocks with high or low frequency. The behavioral results show reduced singleton interference during the high compared to the low frequency block (Won et al., 2019). The fMRI results provide evidence that the attenuation of distractor interference is supported by changes in singleton, target, and non-salient distractor representations within retinotopic visual cortex. These changes in visual cortex are accompanied by findings that singleton-present trials compared to non-singleton trials produce greater activation in bilateral parietal cortex, indicative of attentional capture, in low frequency, but not high frequency blocks. Together, these results suggest that the readout of saliency signals associated with an expected color singleton from visual cortex is suppressed, resulting in less competition for attentional priority in frontoparietal attentional control regions.
A central question about spatial attention is whether it is referenced
relative to the external environment or to the viewer. This question has
received great interest in recent psychological and neuroscience research, with
many but not all, finding evidence for a viewer-centered representation.
However, these previous findings were confined to computer-based tasks that
involved stationary viewers. Because natural search behaviors differ from
computer-based tasks in viewer mobility and spatial scale, it is important to
understand how spatial attention is coded in the natural environment. To this
end, we created an outdoor visual search task in which participants searched a
large (690 square feet), concrete, outdoor space to report which side of a coin
on the ground faced up. They began search in the middle of the space and were
free to move around. Attentional cuing by statistical learning was examined by
placing the coin in one quadrant of the search space on 50% of the
trials. As in computer-based tasks participants learned and used these
regularities to guide search. However, cuing could be referenced to either the
environment or the viewer. The spatial reference frame of attention shows
greater flexibility in the natural environment than previously found in the
lab.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.