Background:There are limited studies in the literature comparing plain radiography, US and CT in the evaluation of intestinal obstruction. We carried out this prospective study to compare the relative efficacies of these three imaging techniques in patients with intestinal obstruction.Material and Methods: Thirty-two patients presenting with clinical suspicion of intestinal obstruction were subjected to plain radiography, US and CT and the findings were compared with reference to the presence or absence of obstruction, the level of obstruction and the cause of obstruction. The final diagnosis was obtained by surgery (n=25), or by contrast studies and/or clinical followup in those who were treated conservatively (n=7).Results: Out of 32 patients, 30 had mechanical intestinal obstruction (22 had small bowel obstruction and 8 had large bowel obstruction). Of the remaining 2 patients, 1 had adynamic ileus and the other had a mesenteric cyst. CT had high sensitivity (%YO), specificity (100%) and accuracy (94%) in diagnosing the presence of obstruction. The comparable sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were, respectively, 83%, 100% and 84% for US and 77%, 50% and 75% for plain radiography. The level of obstruction was correctly predicted in 93% on CT, in 70% on US and in 60% on plain films. CT was superior (87%) to both US (23%) and plain radiography (7%) in determining the aetiology of obstruction.
Conclusion:CT is a highly accurate method in the evaluation of intestinal obstruction especially for determining the level and cause of obstruction and should be the technique of choice when clinical or plain radiographic findings
Sonography is useful for diagnosing gallbladder perforation and detecting the defect in the gallbladder wall. We believe that sonography should be the first-line imaging modality for evaluating the patients in these cases.
23 cases of macrodystrophia lipomatosa (MDL) are reported showing a wide spectrum of radiographic findings. Typical findings were hypertrophy of all the mesodermal tissues of the affected digits with dramatic overgrowth of fat. Phalanges were enlarged both in length and transverse diameter, but the trabecular pattern was maintained. In one patient, the phalanges and metatarsals were elongated but thinned. In another case, all the phalanges and metatarsals of the great toe were small. The little toe was also involved in two cases. Articular surfaces were slanting. There was a high incidence of palmar and plantar involvement. In a few cases the forearm and leg were also involved. Other uncommon features observed were early maturation of epiphyseal centres of ossification of phalanges and metatarsals, syndactyly, polydactyly, brachydactyly and symphalangism. Angiography was uncharacteristic.
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of focal splenic lesions has been infrequently utilized because of the risk of haemorrhage. This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound guided FNAB of splenic lesions. 35 patients with focal splenic lesions underwent FNAB under real-time ultrasound guidance using a free hand technique. Ultrasound findings were single or multiple focal hypoechoic lesions (n = 33), focal hyperechoic lesion (n = 1) and diffuse heterogeneous echotexture (n = 1). Aspirations were performed with 22 G spinal needles using either the subcostal or the intercostal approach. Definite cytological diagnosis was made in 22 patients (62.8%), including tuberculosis in 10 patients, lymphoma in seven patients, extramedullary haematopoiesis in two patients and aspergillosis, histoplasmosis and bacterial abscess in one patient each. FNAB was negative in 12 patients because the aspirates were either scanty or contained only blood. FNAB was falsely positive in one patient. Only one patient had significant intraabdominal bleeding, which was managed conservatively. In conclusion, splenic FNAB performed under ultrasound guidance is a safe and accurate method in the diagnosis of focal splenic lesions.
US provides safe and effective guidance for performing fine-needle aspiration biopsy in orbital mass lesions and is especially useful in deep-seated nonpalpable retrobulbar lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.