Two hypotheses with regard to Chicano versus Anglo susceptibility to influence were examined: that Chicanas are more cooperative (less competitive), and that they are more conforming than female Anglos. The subjects were 281 female university students. “Cooperation group” and “Conformity group” subjects completed modified versions of the Holtzman Inkblot Technique (HIT), with instructions designed to elicit cooperation or conformity. Control group subjects were given standard instructions. An unequal‐N design was submitted to an analysis of variance with four factors: Subject Ethnicity (Chicano or Anglo), Experimenter Ethnicity (Chicano or Anglo), Experimental Condition (Control, Cooperation, Conformity) and Order (Hostile Content first and Living Things Content second or vice versa). Conrary to previous findings, Chicanas were not more conforming or more cooperative than female Anglos. The results were discussed in light of methodological problems in previous studies.
In order to test the hypothesis that Chicanos, as part of a more generally passive coping style, are more likely than Anglos to disclaim responsibility for actions, 374 subjects (196 Anglos and 94 Chicanos) were evaluated. Each subject was presented with 12 stories, and asked to judge the likelihood that 6 alternatives which differed in degree of disclaimed activity, were responsible for the behavior of characters in each story. These judgments provided a measure of disclaimed activity, which is defined as ascribing responsibility for one's actions to someone or something else. It was expected that Chicanos would show even greater disclaimed activity than Anglos on themes related to parents and peers than on stories which involved themes of death. Additionally, it was expected that women would show more disclaimed activity than men. Contrary to earlier studies on disclaimed activity, no significant differences were found between Anglos and Chicanos. Surprisingly, women showed less rather than more disclaimed activity than men, with the difference significant at the .01 level. Conflicts with previous literature are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.